Medical Education Online

1.2k papers and 19.9k indexed citations
i
.

About

The 1.2k papers published in Medical Education Online in the last decades have received a total of 19.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Medical Education Online usually cover Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (824 papers), General Health Professions (408 papers) and Gender Studies (195 papers) specifically the topics of Innovations in Medical Education (726 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (191 papers) and Diversity and Career in Medicine (189 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Medical Education Online are Hongbin Wu, Leisi Pei, Dean X. Parmelee, Meral Demirören, Peggy Soule Odegard, Richard A. Davidson, John Tomkowiak, Preeti Sandhu, Désirée Lie and Lisa J. Merlo.

In The Last Decade

Medical Education Online

1.1k papers receiving 18.0k citations

Fields of papers published in Medical Education Online

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Medical Education Online. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Medical Education Online.

Countries where authors publish in Medical Education Online

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Medical Education Online. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Medical Education Online with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Medical Education Online more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026