Countries where authors publish in Medical Education Online
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Medical Education Online. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Medical Education Online with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Medical Education Online more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Medical Education Online
This network shows the impact of papers published in Medical Education Online. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Medical Education Online.
About Medical Education Online
The 1.2k papers published in Medical Education Online in the last decades have received a total of 21.8k indexed citations . Papers published in Medical Education Online usually cover Family Practice (193 papers), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (837 papers) and Gender Studies (198 papers) specifically the topics of Innovations in Medical Education (738 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (192 papers), Diversity and Career in Medicine (192 papers), Medical Education and Admissions (182 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (150 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (103 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (97 papers) and Health and Medical Research Impacts (87 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Medical Education Online are Hongbin Wu, Leisi Pei, Dean X. Parmelee, Meral Demirören, Richard A. Davidson, John Tomkowiak, Peggy Soule Odegard, Preeti Sandhu, Désirée Lie and Lisa J. Merlo.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.