Guillermo Cebrián
Impact in
- Biotechnology top 0.2%
- Microbial Inactivation Methods
- Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety
- Food Science top 1%
- Radiation Effects and Dosimetry
- Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology
- Probiotics and Fermented Foods
- Fermentation and Sensory Analysis
Papers in
-
- Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety 48
- Microbial Inactivation Methods 45
-
- Enterobacteriaceae and Cronobacter Research 9
- Co-authors
- S. CondónP. MañasIgnacio ÃlvarezJavier RasoRafael PagánCristina ArroyoJuan Manuel MartínezMarta Alejandre
In The Last Decade
Guillermo Cebrián
71 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
- Biotechnology 1.0k
- Food Science 782
- Endocrinology 143
- Physiology 123
- Animal Science and Zoology 239
Countries citing papers authored by Guillermo Cebrián
This map shows the geographic impact of Guillermo Cebrián's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Guillermo Cebrián with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Guillermo Cebrián more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Guillermo Cebrián
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Guillermo Cebrián. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Guillermo Cebrián. The network helps show where Guillermo Cebrián may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Guillermo Cebrián, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 4 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 5 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 7 | 2023 | 10 | |
| 8 | 2023 | 17 | |
| 9 | 2023 | 17 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 6 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 23 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 9 | |
| 13 | 2021 | 36 | |
| 14 | 2020 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2019 | 26 | |
| 16 | 2018 | 9 | |
| 17 | 2016 | 35 | |
| 18 | 2009 | 47 | |
| 19 | 2009 | 21 | |
| 20 | 2007 | 40 |
About Guillermo Cebrián
Guillermo Cebrián is a scholar working on Biotechnology, Endocrinology, Food Science, Physiology and Animal Science and Zoology, having authored 75 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety (48 papers), Microbial Inactivation Methods (45 papers), Radiation Effects and Dosimetry (11 papers), Enterobacteriaceae and Cronobacter Research (9 papers), Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology (9 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (7 papers), Food Drying and Modeling (6 papers) and Magnetic and Electromagnetic Effects (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biotechnology (1.0k citations), Food Science (782 citations), Endocrinology (143 citations), Physiology (123 citations) and Animal Science and Zoology (239 citations). Guillermo Cebrián has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, Norway and Argentina. Frequent co-authors include S. Condón, P. Mañas, Ignacio Ãlvarez, Javier Raso, Rafael Pagán, Cristina Arroyo, Juan Manuel Martínez, Marta Alejandre, Carlota Delso and Jorge Mir‐Bel. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Food Microbiology, Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies, Foods, Food Microbiology and Journal of Applied Microbiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.