Dana L. Joseph

5.6k citations
46 papers · 3.5k indexed · 2 hit papers · h-index 22

Dana L. Joseph

42 papers receiving 3.3k citations

Hit Papers

Leadership training design, delivery, and implem...30420102026201520202505007501000

Peers

Dana L. Joseph
Comparison fields: 5 of 146
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 1.2k
  • Social Psychology 1.9k
  • Applied Psychology 348
  • Clinical Psychology 944
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 462
Replace Pascale M. Le Blanc with:
Pascale M. Le Blanc Netherlands
Esther R. Greenglass Canada
Lisa Fıksenbaum Canada
Thomas W. Britt United States
Joeri Hofmans Belgium
Claude Fernet Canada
Shelley MacDermid Wadsworth United States
Taru Feldt Finland
Winny Shen Canada
Niklas K. Steffens Australia
Dana L. Joseph relative to Pascale M. Le Blanc Netherlands Pascale M. Le Blanc's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Pascale M. Le Blanc · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dana L. Joseph

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dana L. Joseph's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dana L. Joseph with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dana L. Joseph more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dana L. Joseph

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dana L. Joseph. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dana L. Joseph. The network helps show where Dana L. Joseph may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dana L. Joseph, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dana L. Joseph Line = papers co-authored together Dana L. Joseph links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20245
2 20225
3 202022
4 2020101
5 20209
6 20196
7 201998
8 2017122
9
Leadership training design, delivery, and implementation: A meta-analysis.breakdown →
2017304
10 201615
11 2016302
12 20156
13 20156
14 2014271
15 2013181
16 201331
17 201221
18
Emotional intelligence: An integrative meta-analysis and cascading model.breakdown →
20101133
19 200913
20 19976

About Dana L. Joseph

Dana L. Joseph is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Applied Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 46 papers that have together received 3.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (19 papers), Emotional Intelligence and Performance (13 papers), Personality Traits and Psychology (10 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (6 papers), Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation (4 papers), Emotional Labor in Professions (4 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (4 papers) and Work-Family Balance Challenges (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (1.2k citations), Social Psychology (1.9k citations) and Applied Psychology (348 citations). Dana L. Joseph has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Daniel A. Newman, Christina N. Lacerenza, Shannon L. Marlow, Lindsay Y. Dhanani, Mallory A. McCord, Eduardo Salas, Jeremy M. Beus, Jing Jin, Ernest H. O’Boyle and Denise Reyes. Their work appears in journals such as Psychological Bulletin, Journal of Applied Psychology and Journal of Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026