Dana L. Joseph
- Social Psychology top 0.5%
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 0.5%
- Clinical Psychology top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 2%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 2%
- Co-authors
- Daniel A. NewmanChristina N. LacerenzaShannon L. MarlowLindsay Y. DhananiMallory A. McCordEduardo SalasJeremy M. BeusJing Jin
- Topics
- Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (19 papers)Emotional Intelligence and Performance (13 papers)Personality Traits and Psychology (10 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Dana L. Joseph
42 papers receiving 3.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 146
- Social Psychology 1.9k
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 1.2k
- Clinical Psychology 944
- Sociology and Political Science 622
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 462
Countries citing papers authored by Dana L. Joseph
This map shows the geographic impact of Dana L. Joseph's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dana L. Joseph with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dana L. Joseph more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dana L. Joseph
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dana L. Joseph. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dana L. Joseph. The network helps show where Dana L. Joseph may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dana L. Joseph
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dana L. Joseph. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dana L. Joseph based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dana L. Joseph. Dana L. Joseph is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 22 | |
| 4 | 101 | |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 98 | |
| 8 | 122 | |
| 9 | Leadership training design, delivery, and implementation: A meta-analysis.breakdown → | 304 |
| 10 | 15 | |
| 11 | 302 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | 271 | |
| 15 | 181 | |
| 16 | 31 | |
| 17 | 21 | |
| 18 | Emotional intelligence: An integrative meta-analysis and cascading model.breakdown → | 1133 |
| 19 | 13 | |
| 20 | 6 |
About Dana L. Joseph
Dana L. Joseph is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Applied Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 46 papers that have together received 3.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (19 papers), Emotional Intelligence and Performance (13 papers) and Personality Traits and Psychology (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (1.2k citations), Social Psychology (1.9k citations) and Applied Psychology (348 citations). Dana L. Joseph has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Daniel A. Newman, Christina N. Lacerenza, Shannon L. Marlow, Lindsay Y. Dhanani, Mallory A. McCord, Eduardo Salas, Jeremy M. Beus, Jing Jin, Ernest H. O’Boyle and Denise Reyes. Their work appears in journals such as Psychological Bulletin, Journal of Applied Psychology and Journal of Management.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.