Serena Wee

35 papers receiving 759 citations

Peers

Serena Wee
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 148
  • Social Psychology 289
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 157
  • General Decision Sciences 20
  • Clinical Psychology 227
Replace Samuel T. McAbee with:
Samuel T. McAbee United States
Sanaz Talaifar United States
Gary N. Burns United States
Haiyang Yang United States
Bennett E. Postlethwaite United States
David J. Pittenger United States
Kyle A. Thomas United States
Benjamin D Douglas United States
Gabriel Lins de Holanda Coelho Brazil
Serena Wee relative to Samuel T. McAbee United States Samuel T. McAbee's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Samuel T. McAbee · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Serena Wee

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Serena Wee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Serena Wee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Serena Wee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Serena Wee

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Serena Wee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Serena Wee. The network helps show where Serena Wee may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Serena Wee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Serena Wee Line = papers co-authored together Serena Wee links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009100
2 201492
3 201483
4 200980
5 200860
6 202257
7 202136
8 201331
9 202227
10 201425
11 202125
12 202224
13 201723
14 201116
15 200415
16 202215
17 202113
18 202011
19 201811
20 20208

About Serena Wee

Serena Wee is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science and Gender Studies, having authored 38 papers that have together received 808 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Personality Traits and Psychology (7 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (7 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (7 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (6 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (4 papers), Emotional Intelligence and Performance (4 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (4 papers) and Employer Branding and e-HRM (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (148 citations), Social Psychology (289 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (157 citations), General Decision Sciences (20 citations) and Clinical Psychology (227 citations). Serena Wee has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Norman P. Li, Peter K. Jonason, Aaron S. Benjamin, Daniel A. Newman, Q. Chelsea Song, Patrick D. Dunlop, Chris J. Jackson, Sarah A. Hezlett, Nathan R. Kuncel and Bradley J. Brummel. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Psychology, Industrial and Organizational Psychology, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, Journal of Intelligence and Personality and Individual Differences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact