Christopher P. Parker

27 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Hit Papers

Relationships between psychological climate perceptions a...20032026201020182003250500750

Peers

Christopher P. Parker
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 1.1k
  • Sociology and Political Science 536
  • Social Psychology 452
  • General Health Professions 279
  • Gender Studies 260
Replace Parbudyal Singh with:
Parbudyal Singh Canada
Patricia Faison Hewlin Canada
Dan Farrell United States
Marion B. Eberly United States
Susan R. Rhodes United States
Abraham Sagie Israel
Charlie O. Trevor United States
Kim Hester United States
Bronston T. Mayes United States
Joseph W. Huff United States
Christopher P. Parker relative to Parbudyal Singh Canada Parbudyal Singh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Parbudyal Singh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Christopher P. Parker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher P. Parker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher P. Parker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher P. Parker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher P. Parker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher P. Parker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher P. Parker. The network helps show where Christopher P. Parker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Christopher P. Parker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Christopher P. Parker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Christopher P. Parker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Christopher P. Parker. Christopher P. Parker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 19
2 1
3 19
4 5
5 9
6 5
7 31
8 76
9
Relationships between psychological climate perceptions and work outcomes: a meta‐analytic reviewbreakdown →
766
10 176
11 28
12 79
13 34
14 40
15 25
16
Sex stereotyping in the executive suite: "Much ado about something."
79
17 150
18 6
19 30
20 252

About Christopher P. Parker

Christopher P. Parker is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and General Psychology, having authored 28 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (12 papers), Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (5 papers) and Reading and Literacy Development (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (1.1k citations), Public Administration (105 citations) and Gender Studies (260 citations). Christopher P. Parker has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Boris B. Baltes, Scott A. Young, Joseph W. Huff, Robert A. Altmann, Neil Douglas Christiansen, Robert L. Dipboye, Stephen H. Wagner, Ludmila Zhdanova, Cynthia G. Emrich and Jill Kickul. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Psychology, Journal of Management and Journal of Organizational Behavior.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026