William Furey
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Education top 10%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Co-authors
- Rex ForehandRobert J. McMahonDouglas L. GriestTim RogersConnie A. WilliamsA. J. FinchConway F. SaylorMatthew DiMeglio
- Topics
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (9 papers)Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (5 papers)Family and Disability Support Research (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
William Furey
21 papers receiving 332 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Clinical Psychology 245
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 87
- Social Psychology 86
- Education 82
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 49
Countries citing papers authored by William Furey
This map shows the geographic impact of William Furey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Furey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Furey more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William Furey
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Furey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Furey. The network helps show where William Furey may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William Furey
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William Furey. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William Furey based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William Furey. William Furey is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | THE STUBBORN MYTH OF "LEARNING STYLES": State teacher-license prep materials peddle a debunked theory. | 8 |
| 2 | 31 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 13 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 19 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 33 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 44 | |
| 14 | 56 | |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 29 | |
| 18 | 6 | |
| 19 | 91 | |
| 20 | Monitoring of intrathecal polymyxin B dosage during treatment of pseudomonas meningitis. | 7 |
About William Furey
William Furey is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, having authored 21 papers that have together received 377 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (9 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (5 papers) and Family and Disability Support Research (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (245 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (87 citations) and Social Psychology (86 citations). William Furey has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Rex Forehand, Robert J. McMahon, Douglas L. Griest, Tim Rogers, Connie A. Williams, A. J. Finch, Conway F. Saylor, Matthew DiMeglio, Donald J. Carek and John M. Hintze. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, Behaviour Research and Therapy and BMC Health Services Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.