Benjamin Silberglitt

1.1k total citations
16 papers, 588 citations indexed

About

Benjamin Silberglitt is a scholar working on Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Statistics and Probability. According to data from OpenAlex, Benjamin Silberglitt has authored 16 papers receiving a total of 588 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Education, 11 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 7 papers in Statistics and Probability. Recurrent topics in Benjamin Silberglitt's work include Reading and Literacy Development (9 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (7 papers) and Parental Involvement in Education (5 papers). Benjamin Silberglitt is often cited by papers focused on Reading and Literacy Development (9 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (7 papers) and Parental Involvement in Education (5 papers). Benjamin Silberglitt collaborates with scholars based in United States. Benjamin Silberglitt's co-authors include John M. Hintze, Theodore J. Christ, Matthew K. Burns, Shane R. Jimerson, James J. Appleton, Damien C. Cormier, Na’im Madyun, Randy G. Floyd, Robin L. Hojnoski and Marc W. Hernandez and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of School Psychology, Exceptional Children and School Psychology Review.

In The Last Decade

Benjamin Silberglitt

16 papers receiving 515 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Benjamin Silberglitt United States 12 471 363 191 63 47 16 588
Joseph Betts United States 10 346 0.7× 292 0.8× 132 0.7× 82 1.3× 62 1.3× 12 510
Todd W. Busch United States 7 339 0.7× 218 0.6× 135 0.7× 50 0.8× 53 1.1× 9 421
Jan E. Hasbrouck United States 13 479 1.0× 336 0.9× 169 0.9× 37 0.6× 48 1.0× 21 582
Norris B. Phillips United States 10 381 0.8× 422 1.2× 159 0.8× 49 0.8× 86 1.8× 12 593
Phyllis Underwood United States 7 507 1.1× 500 1.4× 152 0.8× 38 0.6× 25 0.5× 9 692
Mary Beth Calhoon United States 13 454 1.0× 389 1.1× 204 1.1× 28 0.4× 94 2.0× 27 621
Kristen N. Missall United States 15 357 0.8× 459 1.3× 246 1.3× 89 1.4× 21 0.4× 42 623
Meenakshi Gajria United States 10 425 0.9× 317 0.9× 120 0.6× 52 0.8× 95 2.0× 13 593
Lisa Pericola Case United States 10 518 1.1× 302 0.8× 235 1.2× 80 1.3× 70 1.5× 10 618
Julie Alonzo United States 11 394 0.8× 275 0.8× 145 0.8× 29 0.5× 59 1.3× 57 541

Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin Silberglitt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin Silberglitt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin Silberglitt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin Silberglitt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin Silberglitt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin Silberglitt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin Silberglitt. The network helps show where Benjamin Silberglitt may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Benjamin Silberglitt

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Benjamin Silberglitt. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Benjamin Silberglitt based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Benjamin Silberglitt. Benjamin Silberglitt is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
1.
Hernandez, Marc W., et al.. (2015). Outcome Evaluation: Minnesota Reading Corps PreK Program. Full Report.. 1 indexed citations
2.
Hernandez, Marc W., et al.. (2014). Impact Evaluation of the Minnesota Reading Corps K-3 Program.. 20 indexed citations
3.
Parker, David C., Kristen L. McMaster, Amanuel Medhanie, & Benjamin Silberglitt. (2011). Modeling early writing growth with curriculum-based measures.. School Psychology Quarterly. 26(4). 290–304. 16 indexed citations
4.
Christ, Theodore J., et al.. (2010). Curriculum-Based Measurement of Oral Reading: An Evaluation of Growth Rates and Seasonal Effects Among Students Served in General and Special Education. School Psychology Review. 39(3). 447–462. 55 indexed citations
5.
Hojnoski, Robin L., Benjamin Silberglitt, & Randy G. Floyd. (2009). Sensitivity to Growth Over Time of the Preschool Numeracy Indicators With a Sample of Preschoolers in Head Start. School Psychology Review. 38(3). 402–418. 23 indexed citations
6.
Burns, Matthew K., et al.. (2008). Longitudinal Effect of a Volunteer Tutoring Program on Reading Skills of Students Identified as At-Risk for Reading Failure: A Two-Year Follow-Up Study. Literacy Research and Instruction. 47(1). 27–37. 11 indexed citations
7.
Silberglitt, Benjamin & John M. Hintze. (2007). How Much Growth Can We Expect? A Conditional Analysis of R—CBM Growth Rates by Level of Performance. Exceptional Children. 74(1). 71–84. 49 indexed citations
8.
Christ, Theodore J. & Benjamin Silberglitt. (2007). Estimates of the Standard Error of Measurement for Curriculum-Based Measures of Oral Reading Fluency. School Psychology Review. 36(1). 130–146. 73 indexed citations
9.
Silberglitt, Benjamin, Shane R. Jimerson, Matthew K. Burns, & James J. Appleton. (2006). Does the Timing of Grade Retention Make a Difference? Examining the Effects of Early Versus Later Retention. School Psychology Review. 35(1). 134–141. 40 indexed citations
10.
Silberglitt, Benjamin, et al.. (2006). Relationship of reading fluency assessment data with state accountability test scores: A longitudinal comparison of grade levels. Psychology in the Schools. 43(5). 527–535. 54 indexed citations
11.
Silberglitt, Benjamin, James J. Appleton, Matthew K. Burns, & Shane R. Jimerson. (2006). Examining the effects of grade retention on student reading performance: A longitudinal study. Journal of School Psychology. 44(4). 255–270. 32 indexed citations
12.
Silberglitt, Benjamin & John M. Hintze. (2005). Formative Assessment Using Cbm-R Cut Scores To Track Progress Toward Success On State-Mandated Achievement Tests: a Comparison of Methods. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment. 23(4). 304–325. 75 indexed citations
13.
Hintze, John M. & Benjamin Silberglitt. (2005). A Longitudinal Examination of the Diagnostic Accuracy and Predictive Validity of R-CBM and High-Stakes Testing. School Psychology Review. 34(3). 372–386. 108 indexed citations
14.
Silberglitt, Benjamin, et al.. (2003). Tracking Preschoolers' Language and Preliteracy Development Using a General Outcome Measurement System. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education. 23(3). 114–123. 17 indexed citations
15.
Silberglitt, Benjamin, et al.. (2003). A Schoolwide Organization System for Raising Reading Achievement Using General Outcome Measures and Evidence-Based Instruction: One Education District's Experience. Assessment for Effective Intervention. 28(3-4). 59–71. 11 indexed citations
16.
McConnell, Scott R., Kristen N. Missall, Benjamin Silberglitt, & M. McEvoy. (2002). Promoting social development in preschool classrooms. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026