David C. Parker

1.2k citations
50 papers · 737 indexed · h-index 16
Topics
Reading and Literacy Development (30 papers)Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (15 papers)Behavioral and Psychological Studies (12 papers)

In The Last Decade

David C. Parker

44 papers receiving 686 citations

Peers

David C. Parker
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 331
  • Education 300
  • Organic Chemistry 258
  • Statistics and Probability 120
  • Molecular Biology 49
Replace William R. Veal with:
William R. Veal United States
José Saborit Spain
Ginger V. Shultz United States
Colin Foster United Kingdom
Rebecca Simmons United States
Kristen L. Murphy United States
Norbert J. Pienta United States
Miles Pickering United States
Diego Ardura Spain
Taehee Noh South Korea
David C. Parker relative to William R. Veal United States William R. Veal's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.2×
William R. Veal · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David C. Parker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David C. Parker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David C. Parker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David C. Parker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David C. Parker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David C. Parker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David C. Parker. The network helps show where David C. Parker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David C. Parker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David C. Parker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David C. Parker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David C. Parker. David C. Parker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2 0
3 0
4 0
5 4
6 1
7 5
8 4
9 7
10 13
11 5
12 21
13 9
14 20
15 11
16 62
17 2
18 16
19 9
20 28

About David C. Parker

David C. Parker is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Statistics and Probability and Education, having authored 50 papers that have together received 737 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reading and Literacy Development (30 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (15 papers) and Behavioral and Psychological Studies (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (331 citations), Statistics and Probability (120 citations) and Education (300 citations). David C. Parker has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Chile. Frequent co-authors include Matthew K. Burns, Ian Fleming, Philip E.J. Sanderson, Rolf Henning, Kristen L. McMaster, Ethan R. Van Norman, Anne F. Zaslofsky, Rebecca Kanive, Xiaoqing Du and David A. Klingbeil. Their work appears in journals such as Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry, Journal of School Psychology and Exceptional Children.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026