Kristen L. McMaster

4.5k total citations
105 papers, 2.8k citations indexed

About

Kristen L. McMaster is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education and Statistics and Probability. According to data from OpenAlex, Kristen L. McMaster has authored 105 papers receiving a total of 2.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 83 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 61 papers in Education and 18 papers in Statistics and Probability. Recurrent topics in Kristen L. McMaster's work include Reading and Literacy Development (74 papers), Writing and Handwriting Education (34 papers) and Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (18 papers). Kristen L. McMaster is often cited by papers focused on Reading and Literacy Development (74 papers), Writing and Handwriting Education (34 papers) and Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (18 papers). Kristen L. McMaster collaborates with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and United Kingdom. Kristen L. McMaster's co-authors include Christine A. Espin, Panayiota Kendeou, Paul van den Broek, David N. Rapp, Douglas Fuchs, Lynn S. Fuchs, Donald L. Compton, Gena Nelson, Erica S. Lembke and Xiaoqing Du and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Educational Psychology, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology and Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis.

In The Last Decade

Kristen L. McMaster

95 papers receiving 2.5k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Kristen L. McMaster United States 26 2.1k 1.5k 531 364 271 105 2.8k
Christine A. Espin United States 30 2.3k 1.1× 1.6k 1.1× 748 1.4× 308 0.8× 275 1.0× 64 2.9k
Patricia G. Mathes United States 31 2.4k 1.2× 1.6k 1.1× 750 1.4× 280 0.8× 365 1.3× 55 2.9k
Deborah C. Simmons United States 32 3.1k 1.5× 2.2k 1.5× 898 1.7× 261 0.7× 266 1.0× 88 3.7k
William J. Therrien United States 24 1.4k 0.7× 1.1k 0.7× 456 0.9× 307 0.8× 381 1.4× 96 2.2k
Stephanie Al Otaiba United States 35 3.2k 1.6× 2.4k 1.6× 830 1.6× 423 1.2× 323 1.2× 133 3.9k
Gerald Tindal United States 34 2.4k 1.2× 2.0k 1.4× 812 1.5× 256 0.7× 744 2.7× 179 3.5k
Carolyn A. Denton United States 35 2.5k 1.2× 1.5k 1.0× 937 1.8× 430 1.2× 275 1.0× 81 3.1k
Sylvia Linan‐Thompson United States 25 2.0k 1.0× 1.4k 1.0× 581 1.1× 167 0.5× 289 1.1× 47 2.5k
Jade Wexler United States 24 1.7k 0.8× 1.2k 0.8× 604 1.1× 171 0.5× 348 1.3× 63 2.3k
Edward J. Kameenui United States 31 2.8k 1.4× 1.7k 1.2× 839 1.6× 260 0.7× 196 0.7× 95 3.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Kristen L. McMaster

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kristen L. McMaster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kristen L. McMaster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kristen L. McMaster more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kristen L. McMaster

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kristen L. McMaster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kristen L. McMaster. The network helps show where Kristen L. McMaster may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kristen L. McMaster

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kristen L. McMaster. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kristen L. McMaster based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kristen L. McMaster. Kristen L. McMaster is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
McMaster, Kristen L., et al.. (2025). Revisiting Special Educators’ Usability and Feasibility of Data-Based Instruction. Remedial and Special Education.
2.
Pétursdóttir, Anna‐Lind, et al.. (2025). Reading growth across 1st grade: is there a Matthew effect in Icelandic schools?. European Journal of Psychology of Education. 40(1). 1 indexed citations
4.
McMaster, Kristen L., et al.. (2025). Technical Features of Sentence-Level Curriculum-Based Measures and Language Sample Analysis for Students With Writing Difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities. 2708237934–2708237934.
6.
Lembke, Erica S., et al.. (2024). Sustained use of data-based writing instruction before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.. Journal of Educational Psychology. 116(7). 1196–1214. 5 indexed citations
7.
Lembke, Erica S., et al.. (2024). Data based individualization in early writing: the importance and measurement of implementation fidelity. Frontiers in Education. 9. 1 indexed citations
8.
Hwang, HyeJin, et al.. (2024). Indirect and direct contributions of executive functions to reading comprehension. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 243. 105925–105925. 3 indexed citations
9.
Hwang, HyeJin, et al.. (2023). Making the Most ofRead‐Aloudsto SupportPrimary‐GradeStudents'Inference‐Making. The Reading Teacher. 77(2). 167–177. 4 indexed citations
10.
Otaiba, Stephanie Al, et al.. (2022). What We Know and Need to Know about Literacy Interventions for Elementary Students with Reading Difficulties and Disabilities, including Dyslexia. Reading Research Quarterly. 58(2). 313–332. 19 indexed citations
11.
McMaster, Kristen L., et al.. (2020). Systematic Review of Curriculum-Based Measurement with Students Who Are Deaf. The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education. 25(4). 398–410. 1 indexed citations
12.
Shin, Jaehyun, et al.. (2019). Technical Adequacy of Curriculum-Based Measures in Writing in Grades 1–3. Reading & Writing Quarterly. 36(6). 563–587. 14 indexed citations
13.
Puranik, Cynthia S., et al.. (2017). Examining Alphabet Writing Fluency in Kindergarten: Exploring the Issue of Time on Task.. Grantee Submission. 42(2). 81–96. 1 indexed citations
14.
Parker, David C., Matthew K. Burns, Kristen L. McMaster, & Edward S. Shapiro. (2012). Extending Curriculum‐based Assessment to Early Writing. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice. 27(1). 33–43. 11 indexed citations
15.
McMaster, Kristen L., et al.. (2011). Using Curriculum-Based Measurement for Struggling Beginning. Teaching Exceptional Children. 44(2). 26–34. 2 indexed citations
16.
McMaster, Kristen L., Douglas Fuchs, & Lynn S. Fuchs. (2007). Promises and Limitations of Peer-Assisted Learning Strategies in Reading.. 5(2). 97–112. 19 indexed citations
17.
McMaster, Kristen L., Douglas Fuchs, Lynn S. Fuchs, & Donald L. Compton. (2005). Responding to Nonresponders: An Experimental Field Trial of Identification and Intervention Methods. Exceptional Children. 71(4). 445–463. 183 indexed citations
18.
Sutherland, Kevin S., et al.. (2004). Maximizing the benefits of cooperative learning for students with learning and/or behavior problems. Beyond Behavior. 12–16.
19.
Fuchs, Douglas, et al.. (2004). Non-responders: How to find them? How to help them? What do they mean for special education?. Teaching Exceptional Children. 37. 72–77. 3 indexed citations
20.
Fuchs, Douglas, Lynn S. Fuchs, Kristen L. McMaster, & Stephanie Al Otaiba. (2003). Identifying children at risk for reading failure: Curriculum-Based Measurement and the dual discrepancy approach. 235–246. 18 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026