John M. Hintze

2.9k total citations
45 papers, 1.9k citations indexed

About

John M. Hintze is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Statistics and Probability and Education. According to data from OpenAlex, John M. Hintze has authored 45 papers receiving a total of 1.9k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 38 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 20 papers in Statistics and Probability and 19 papers in Education. Recurrent topics in John M. Hintze's work include Reading and Literacy Development (26 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (20 papers) and Behavioral and Psychological Studies (16 papers). John M. Hintze is often cited by papers focused on Reading and Literacy Development (26 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (20 papers) and Behavioral and Psychological Studies (16 papers). John M. Hintze collaborates with scholars based in United States and Mexico. John M. Hintze's co-authors include Edward S. Shapiro, Benjamin Silberglitt, Theodore J. Christ, Tanya L. Eckert, Edward J. Daly, William J. Matthews, Gary D. Stoner, Robert J. Volpe, Scott A. Methe and James C. DiPerna and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of School Psychology, Exceptional Children and School Psychology Review.

In The Last Decade

John M. Hintze

44 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
John M. Hintze United States 26 1.5k 895 570 414 213 45 1.9k
Roland H. Good United States 28 2.2k 1.5× 1.4k 1.6× 716 1.3× 391 0.9× 282 1.3× 52 2.6k
Amanda M. VanDerHeyden United States 28 1.6k 1.1× 1.1k 1.2× 652 1.1× 488 1.2× 223 1.0× 69 2.1k
Theodore J. Christ United States 26 1.8k 1.2× 950 1.1× 680 1.2× 583 1.4× 344 1.6× 83 2.3k
Deborah L. Speece United States 27 1.8k 1.2× 1.1k 1.2× 526 0.9× 284 0.7× 211 1.0× 50 2.2k
Edward J. Daly United States 25 1.7k 1.1× 671 0.7× 718 1.3× 358 0.9× 372 1.7× 63 1.9k
Jade Wexler United States 24 1.7k 1.2× 1.2k 1.4× 604 1.1× 245 0.6× 171 0.8× 63 2.3k
Robin S. Codding United States 23 1.3k 0.9× 766 0.9× 545 1.0× 450 1.1× 429 2.0× 86 1.9k
Scott A. Stage United States 21 1.2k 0.8× 627 0.7× 247 0.4× 580 1.4× 344 1.6× 41 1.6k
Candace S. Bos United States 24 1.3k 0.9× 1.2k 1.4× 452 0.8× 293 0.7× 175 0.8× 43 2.0k
Nancy Scammacca United States 17 1.3k 0.9× 916 1.0× 583 1.0× 119 0.3× 145 0.7× 36 1.8k

Countries citing papers authored by John M. Hintze

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John M. Hintze's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John M. Hintze with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John M. Hintze more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John M. Hintze

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John M. Hintze. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John M. Hintze. The network helps show where John M. Hintze may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John M. Hintze

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John M. Hintze. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John M. Hintze based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John M. Hintze. John M. Hintze is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hintze, John M., et al.. (2017). Decision-Making Accuracy of CBM Progress-Monitoring Data. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment. 36(1). 74–81. 14 indexed citations
2.
Furey, William, et al.. (2015). Concurrent validity and classification accuracy of curriculum-based measurement for written expression.. School Psychology Quarterly. 31(3). 369–382. 19 indexed citations
3.
Solomon, Benjamin G., et al.. (2012). A meta‐analysis of school‐wide positive behavior support: An exploratory study using single‐case synthesis. Psychology in the Schools. 49(2). 105–121. 83 indexed citations
4.
Eckert, Tanya L. & John M. Hintze. (2011). School psychology publishing contributions to the advancement of knowledge, science, and its application: An introduction to the themed issue. Journal of School Psychology. 49(6). 613–616. 1 indexed citations
5.
Hintze, John M., et al.. (2010). Improving Field Supervision through Collaborative Supervision Institutes.. Communique. 38(7). 22–24. 4 indexed citations
6.
Hintze, John M., et al.. (2009). Incremental and predictive utility of formative assessment methods of reading comprehension. Journal of School Psychology. 47(5). 315–335. 48 indexed citations
7.
Silberglitt, Benjamin & John M. Hintze. (2007). How Much Growth Can We Expect? A Conditional Analysis of R—CBM Growth Rates by Level of Performance. Exceptional Children. 74(1). 71–84. 49 indexed citations
8.
Shapiro, Edward S., et al.. (2006). Curriculum-Based Measures and Performance on State Assessment and Standardized Tests. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment. 24(1). 19–35. 86 indexed citations
10.
Hintze, John M., Theodore J. Christ, & Scott A. Methe. (2005). Curriculum‐based assessment. Psychology in the Schools. 43(1). 45–56. 59 indexed citations
11.
Volpe, Robert J., James C. DiPerna, John M. Hintze, & Edward S. Shapiro. (2005). Observing Students in Classroom Settings: A Review of Seven Coding Schemes. School Psychology Review. 34(4). 454–474. 123 indexed citations
12.
Silberglitt, Benjamin & John M. Hintze. (2005). Formative Assessment Using Cbm-R Cut Scores To Track Progress Toward Success On State-Mandated Achievement Tests: a Comparison of Methods. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment. 23(4). 304–325. 75 indexed citations
13.
14.
Hintze, John M., et al.. (2002). The Generalizability of CBM Survey-Level Mathematics Assessments: Just How Many Samples Do We Need?. School Psychology Review. 31(4). 514–528. 41 indexed citations
15.
Hintze, John M., et al.. (2002). Oral Reading Fluency and Prediction of Reading Comprehension in African American and Caucasian Elementary School Children. School Psychology Review. 31(4). 540–553. 40 indexed citations
16.
Daly, Edward J., et al.. (2000). Improving practice by taking steps toward technological improvements in academic intervention in the new millennium. Psychology in the Schools. 37(1). 61–72.
17.
Eckert, Tanya L. & John M. Hintze. (2000). Behavioral conceptions and applications of acceptability: Issues related to service delivery and research methodology.. School Psychology Quarterly. 15(2). 123–148. 96 indexed citations
18.
Hintze, John M., Steven V. Owen, Edward S. Shapiro, & Edward J. Daly. (2000). Generalizability of oral reading fluency measures: Application of G theory to curriculum-based measurement.. School Psychology Quarterly. 15(1). 52–68. 62 indexed citations
19.
Hintze, John M., Edward J. Daly, & Edward S. Shapiro. (1998). An Investigation of the Effects of Passage Difficulty Level on Outcomes of Oral Reading Fluency Progress Monitoring. School Psychology Review. 27(3). 433–445. 45 indexed citations
20.
Bray, Melissa A., Thomas J. Kehle, & John M. Hintze. (1998). Profile Analysis with the Wechsler Scales. School Psychology International. 19(3). 209–220. 18 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026