Julie Alonzo
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 2%
- Education top 5%
- Statistics and Probability top 2%
- Safety Research top 10%
- Information Systems top 10%
- Co-authors
- Gerald TindalPaul YovanoffLuke DuesberyDeni BasarabaJoseph F. T. NeseGina BiancarosaLeanne R. Ketterlin–GellerDaniel Anderson
- Topics
- Reading and Literacy Development (20 papers)Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (9 papers)Education and Technology Integration (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesPhilippines
In The Last Decade
Julie Alonzo
49 papers receiving 477 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 394
- Education 275
- Statistics and Probability 145
- Safety Research 59
- Information Systems 58
Countries citing papers authored by Julie Alonzo
This map shows the geographic impact of Julie Alonzo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julie Alonzo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julie Alonzo more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Julie Alonzo
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julie Alonzo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julie Alonzo. The network helps show where Julie Alonzo may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Julie Alonzo
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Julie Alonzo. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Julie Alonzo based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Julie Alonzo. Julie Alonzo is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Innovation Need Survey: Implementing a Technology Tool to Improve Early Data-Based Decisions to Address and Prevent Learning Disabilities. Technical Report #1602. | 2 |
| 2 | easyCBM Norms. 2014 Edition. Technical Report #1409. | 1 |
| 3 | Technical Manual: easyCBM. Technical Report #1408. | 3 |
| 4 | An Examination of Test-Retest, Alternate Form Reliability, and Generalizability Theory Study of the easyCBM Reading Assessments: Grade 5. Technical Report #1220. | 4 |
| 5 | The Development and Scaling of the easyCBM CCSS Elementary Mathematics Measures: Grade K. Technical Report #1314. | 2 |
| 6 | The Development of the easyCBM CCSS Reading Assessments: Grade 3. Technical Report #1221. | 0 |
| 7 | The Development of CBM Vocabulary Measures: Grade 2. Technical Report #1209. | 0 |
| 8 | The Alignment of the easyCBM Grades 3-5 Math Measures to the Common Core Standards. Technical Report #1229. | 1 |
| 9 | Analyzing the Reliability of the easyCBM Reading Comprehension Measures: Grade 6. Technical Report #1205. | 1 |
| 10 | Cross-Validation of easyCBM Reading Cut Scores in Oregon: 2009-2010. Technical Report #1108. | 1 |
| 11 | The Development and Technical Adequacy of Seventh-Grade Reading Comprehension Measures in a Progress Monitoring Assessment System. Technical Report #1102. | 1 |
| 12 | Technical Adequacy of the easyCBM[R] Mathematics Measures: Grades 3-8, 2009-2010 Version. Technical Report #1007. | 1 |
| 13 | The Alignment of easyCBM[R] Math Measures to Curriculum Standards. Technical Report #1002. | 1 |
| 14 | easyCBM[R] Mathematics Criterion Related Validity Evidence: Washington State Test. Technical Report #1010. | 2 |
| 15 | Technical Adequacy of the easyCBM Reading Measures (Grades 3-7), 2009-2010 Version. Technical Report #1005. | 5 |
| 16 | Criterion-Related Evidence Using easyCBM[R] Reading Measures and Student Demographics to Predict State Test Performance in Grades 3-8. Technical Report # 0910. | 0 |
| 17 | The Development of K-8 Progress Monitoring Measures in Mathematics for Use with the 2% and General Education Populations: Grade 5. Technical Report # 09-01. | 2 |
| 18 | Examining the Technical Adequacy of Second-Grade Reading Comprehension Measures in a Progress Monitoring Assessment System. Technical Report # 08-08. | 3 |
| 19 | The Development of Middle School Passage Reading Fluency Measures for use in a Progress Monitoring Assessment System (Technical Report #46) | 8 |
| 20 | The Development of Early Literacy Measures for Use in a Progress Monitoring Assessment System: Letter Names, Letter Sounds and Phoneme Segmenting. Technical Report # 39. | 7 |
About Julie Alonzo
Julie Alonzo is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Statistics and Probability and Education, having authored 57 papers that have together received 541 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reading and Literacy Development (20 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (9 papers) and Education and Technology Integration (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (394 citations), Statistics and Probability (145 citations) and Education (275 citations). Julie Alonzo has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Philippines. Frequent co-authors include Gerald Tindal, Paul Yovanoff, Luke Duesbery, Deni Basaraba, Joseph F. T. Nese, Gina Biancarosa, Leanne R. Ketterlin–Geller, Daniel Anderson, Scott Baker and Kelli D. Cummings. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of School Psychology, Learning and Individual Differences and School Psychology Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.