Countries citing papers authored by Arlene C. Borthwick
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Arlene C. Borthwick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Arlene C. Borthwick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Arlene C. Borthwick more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Arlene C. Borthwick
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Arlene C. Borthwick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Arlene C. Borthwick. The network helps show where Arlene C. Borthwick may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Arlene C. Borthwick
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Arlene C. Borthwick.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Arlene C. Borthwick based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Arlene C. Borthwick. Arlene C. Borthwick is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Clausen, Jon, et al.. (2020). Teacher education faculty perspectives on technology infusion: Implications for schools and colleges of education. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference. 933–937.1 indexed citations
Milman, Natalie B., Rhonda Christensen, J. Michael Spector, et al.. (2016). A Revised Replication Study Typology and A Call for Participation: Replication Studies involving Technology and Teacher Education. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference. 2016(1). 1115–1119.2 indexed citations
8.
Carpenter, Jeffrey P., et al.. (2016). A Diagnostic Tool to Help Leaders Develop TPACK Ready Teacher Preparation Programs. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference. 2016(1). 2802–2805.2 indexed citations
9.
Borthwick, Arlene C., et al.. (2011). Lessons from New Zealand: Leadership for Learning.. Learning and leading with technology. 38(5). 20–25.1 indexed citations
10.
Borthwick, Arlene C., et al.. (2010). Lessons from New Zealand.. Learning and leading with technology. 38(3). 14–19.3 indexed citations
11.
Pierson, Melissa & Arlene C. Borthwick. (2010). Framing the Assessment of Educational Technology Professional Development in a Culture of Learning.. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education. 26(4). 126–131.10 indexed citations
12.
Hean, Sarah, Marilyn Hammick, Margaret Miers, et al.. (2009). Evolving theory in interprofessional education: conclusion report res-451-26-0360. Minerva Medica. 51. 2129–31.5 indexed citations
13.
Borthwick, Arlene C., et al.. (2008). Exploring Essential Conditions: A Commentary on Bull et al. (2008). Contemporary issues in technology and teacher education. 8(3). 195–201.2 indexed citations
14.
Borthwick, Arlene C., et al.. (2005). Lessons from Costa Rica.. Learning and leading with technology. 33(2). 18–21.3 indexed citations
Borthwick, Arlene C., et al.. (2002). Designing Online Instruction: Analyzing the Process, Product, and Implementation. American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting. 2002(1).
19.
Borthwick, Arlene C., et al.. (2002). Results of Separate and Integrated Technology Instruction in Preservice Training..11 indexed citations
20.
Walker, Rebecca, Arlene C. Borthwick, & Lawrence Ingvarson. (1981). A photographic case study : history teaching at Karingal High School.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.