Violet T. Ho

40 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers

Violet T. Ho
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 1.5k
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 304
  • Social Psychology 856
  • Demography 357
  • Business and International Management 55
Replace Herman H. M. Tse with:
Herman H. M. Tse Australia
Karoline Strauss France
Jia‐Chi Huang Taiwan
Robert S. Rubin United States
Benjamin M. Galvin United States
Amy Wei Tian Australia
Dave Bouckenooghe Canada
Elaine C. Hollensbe United States
Yongmei Liu United States
Nathan J. Hiller United States
Violet T. Ho relative to Herman H. M. Tse Australia Herman H. M. Tse's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Herman H. M. Tse · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Violet T. Ho

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Violet T. Ho's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Violet T. Ho with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Violet T. Ho more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Violet T. Ho

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Violet T. Ho. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Violet T. Ho. The network helps show where Violet T. Ho may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Violet T. Ho, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Violet T. Ho Line = papers co-authored together Violet T. Ho links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006427
2 2009297
3 2020206
4 2013188
5 2005120
6 2005116
7 2018116
8 2003103
9 200682
10 201579
11 201871
12 201668
13 202064
14 201757
15 200356
16 201548
17 201640
18 201240
19 201638
20 200735

About Violet T. Ho

Violet T. Ho is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Demography and Safety Research, having authored 44 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (28 papers), Workaholism, burnout, and well-being (15 papers), Workplace Spirituality and Leadership (9 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (6 papers), Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (4 papers), Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (4 papers), Knowledge Management and Sharing (3 papers) and Emotional Labor in Professions (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (1.5k citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (304 citations), Social Psychology (856 citations), Demography (357 citations) and Business and International Management (55 citations). Violet T. Ho has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Singapore and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Denise M. Rousseau, Jeffrey M. Pollack, Jerald Greenberg, Dejun Tony Kong, Sze‐Sze Wong, Chay Hoon Lee, Laurie L. Levesque, Marina Astakhova, Ernest H. O’Boyle and Bradley L. Kirkman. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Organizational Behavior, Journal of Vocational Behavior, Journal of Management Studies, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Human Relations.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact