Naina Gupta
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 10%
- Communication top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Management Science and Operations Research top 10%
- Co-authors
- Mary J. WallerRobert C. GiambatistaViolet T. HoAndrea B. HollingsheadJeffrey M. PollackLei LaiDavid P. BrandonNaveen Venkatesh Sridharan
- Topics
- Team Dynamics and Performance (5 papers)Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (3 papers)Knowledge Management and Sharing (1 paper)
- Journals
- Management ScienceJournal of Organizational BehaviorJournal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
- Partner nations
- SingaporeUnited StatesIndia
In The Last Decade
Naina Gupta
8 papers receiving 271 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Social Psychology 183
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 76
- Communication 68
- Sociology and Political Science 56
- Management Science and Operations Research 44
Countries citing papers authored by Naina Gupta
This map shows the geographic impact of Naina Gupta's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Naina Gupta with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Naina Gupta more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Naina Gupta
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Naina Gupta. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Naina Gupta. The network helps show where Naina Gupta may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Naina Gupta
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Naina Gupta. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Naina Gupta based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Naina Gupta. Naina Gupta is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 37 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 18 | |
| 6 | Transactive memory theory and teams: Past, present, and future. | 18 |
| 7 | 28 | |
| 8 | Differentiated Versus Integrated Transactive Memory Effectiveness: It Depends on the Task | 6 |
| 9 | 24 | |
| 10 | 157 |
About Naina Gupta
Naina Gupta is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, having authored 10 papers that have together received 294 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Team Dynamics and Performance (5 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (3 papers) and Knowledge Management and Sharing (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (68 citations), Social Psychology (183 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (76 citations). Naina Gupta has collaborated with scholars based in Singapore, United States and India. Frequent co-authors include Mary J. Waller, Robert C. Giambatista, Violet T. Ho, Andrea B. Hollingshead, Jeffrey M. Pollack, Lei Lai, David P. Brandon, Naveen Venkatesh Sridharan and Sujoy Sarkar. Their work appears in journals such as Management Science, Journal of Organizational Behavior and Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.