Ulrike Fasbender

2.0k citations
45 papers · 1.2k indexed · h-index 19

Ulrike Fasbender

41 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Ulrike Fasbender
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 115
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 574
  • Demography 458
  • Communication 216
  • Business and International Management 42
Replace Sarah Wright with:
Sarah Wright New Zealand
Tim Vantilborgh Belgium
Christina Cregan Australia
Bryan Fuller United States
Hetty van Emmerik Netherlands
Mandy E.G. van der Velde Netherlands
Hai‐Jiang Wang China
Lisa Kuron Canada
Veronica M. Godshalk United States
Elizabeth M. Campbell United States
Ulrike Fasbender relative to Sarah Wright New Zealand Sarah Wright's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×14.4×
Sarah Wright · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ulrike Fasbender

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ulrike Fasbender's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ulrike Fasbender with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ulrike Fasbender more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ulrike Fasbender

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ulrike Fasbender. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ulrike Fasbender. The network helps show where Ulrike Fasbender may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ulrike Fasbender, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ulrike Fasbender Line = papers co-authored together Ulrike Fasbender links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20250
3 20250
4 20246
5 20240
6 20245
7 20241
8 20239
9 20232
10 202220
11 20221
12 202155
13 202115
14 202116
15 2018119
16 201814
17 2018133
18 201731
19 201740
20 201639

About Ulrike Fasbender

Ulrike Fasbender is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Demography, having authored 45 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (25 papers), Retirement, Disability, and Employment (21 papers), Aging and Gerontology Research (8 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (7 papers), Work-Family Balance Challenges (7 papers), Knowledge Management and Sharing (5 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (4 papers) and Emotions and Moral Behavior (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (115 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (574 citations) and Demography (458 citations). Ulrike Fasbender has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Fabiola H. Gerpott, Anne Burmeister, Mo Wang, Jürgen Deller, Ute‐Christine Klehe, Anne Marit Wöhrmann, B.I.J.M. van der Heijden, Norbert Kailer, Carolin Palmer and Sascha Kraus. Their work appears in journals such as Work Aging and Retirement, Journal of Vocational Behavior, Frontiers in Psychology, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology and The Career Development Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026