The Career Development Quarterly

1.1k papers and 25.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.1k papers published in The Career Development Quarterly in the last decades have received a total of 25.7k indexed citations. Papers published in The Career Development Quarterly usually cover Safety Research (778 papers), Education (503 papers) and Social Psychology (470 papers) specifically the topics of Career Development and Diversity (755 papers), Higher Education and Employability (246 papers) and Mentoring and Academic Development (227 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Career Development Quarterly are Mark L. Savickas, Robert W. Lent, Nancy E. Betz, David L. Blustein, Andreas Hirschi, Ryan D. Duffy, Steven D. Brown, Wei‐Cheng Mau, Nadya A. Fouad and Y. Barry Chung.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The Career Development Quarterly

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Career Development Quarterly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Career Development Quarterly.

Countries where authors publish in The Career Development Quarterly

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Career Development Quarterly. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Career Development Quarterly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Career Development Quarterly more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025