Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Citations per year, relative to Steven W. Graham Steven W. Graham (= 1×)
peers
Claude Goldenberg
Countries citing papers authored by Steven W. Graham
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Steven W. Graham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steven W. Graham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steven W. Graham more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Steven W. Graham
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steven W. Graham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steven W. Graham. The network helps show where Steven W. Graham may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Steven W. Graham
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Steven W. Graham.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Steven W. Graham based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Steven W. Graham. Steven W. Graham is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Harris, Karen R., Steven W. Graham, & Tim Urdan. (2012). Application to learning and teaching. American Psychological Association eBooks.12 indexed citations
4.
Graham, Steven W.. (2009). A case study of university students' use of flickr photographic networking to develop confidence, English language fluency and shape world consciousness. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.1 indexed citations
5.
Massy, William F., et al.. (2007). Academic Quality Work: A Handbook for Improvement.11 indexed citations
Graham, Steven W., et al.. (2000). The Effects of Instructional Climate and Student Affairs Services on College Outcomes and Satisfaction.. Journal of college student development. 41(3).22 indexed citations
9.
Graham, Steven W., et al.. (2000). The Effect of Educational Ethos and Campus Involvement on Self-Reported College Outcomes for Traditional and Nontraditional Undergraduates.. Journal of college student development. 41(5). 488–502.19 indexed citations
10.
Graham, Steven W., et al.. (1999). Student Retention in an Historically Black Institution.. College student journal. 35(1). 143.13 indexed citations
11.
Graham, Steven W., et al.. (1998). Participation in Education and Training: The Influence of Preparation and Organizational Roles.. Journal of instructional psychology. 25(1). 21–33.5 indexed citations
12.
Graham, Steven W.. (1998). Adult Growth in College: The Effects of Age and Educational Ethos.. Journal of college student development. 39(3).16 indexed citations
Hughes, Julie, Steven W. Graham, & Michael W. Galbraith. (1986). Adult Development: A Multifaceted Approach. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education. 34(3). 24–28.2 indexed citations
20.
Graham, Steven W.. (1986). Factors Related to Involvement in Continuing Education among Post-Baccalaureate Degree Adults.. 50(2). 93–102.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.