This map shows the geographic impact of John Wedman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Wedman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Wedman more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Wedman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Wedman. The network helps show where John Wedman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Wedman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Wedman.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Wedman based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with John Wedman. John Wedman is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Lu, Wei-Hsin, et al.. (2004). Building Cross Cultural Partnerships Through the Internet: What Works and What Doesn't. EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology. 2004(1). 4782–4786.2 indexed citations
2.
Wang, Feng‐Kwei & John Wedman. (2003). Designing and Evaluating a Web-based Lesson Planning System. EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology. 2003(1). 1875–1880.1 indexed citations
Wedman, John, et al.. (1998). Building Technology Infrastructure and Enterprises in a College of Education: Increasing Performance Capacity.. Educational Technology archive. 38(5). 12–19.4 indexed citations
5.
Laffey, James M., Dale Musser, & John Wedman. (1998). A Technology Infrastructure for Teacher Education. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference. 1998(1). 77–81.3 indexed citations
Wedman, John. (1996). Analysis of Analogical Problem-Solving Processes via Think-Aloud Protocols.. Journal of research and development in education. 30(1). 51–62.5 indexed citations
9.
Wedman, John, et al.. (1995). Lessons Relearned: Another Faulty Implementation of an Educational Innovation.. International journal of instructional media. 22(3).2 indexed citations
Wedman, John, et al.. (1993). A Study of the Conditions Influencing Analogical Problem Solving.. Journal of research and development in education. 26(4).5 indexed citations
Wedman, John & Martin Tessmer. (1991). Adapting instructional design to project circumstance: the layers of necessity model. Educational Technology archive. 48–52.13 indexed citations
14.
Graham, Steven W. & John Wedman. (1989). Enhancing the Appeal of Teletraining.. Journal of instructional psychology. 16(4).7 indexed citations
15.
Wedman, John & Patricia L. Smith. (1989). An Examination of Two Approaches To Organizing Instruction..4 indexed citations
16.
Wedman, John. (1988). Increasing the Use of Instructional Media in the Schools.. Educational Technology archive. 28(10). 26–31.2 indexed citations
17.
Wedman, John. (1987). Citation patterns in the computer-based instruction literature. The Journal of Computer Based Instruction. 14(3). 91–95.3 indexed citations
18.
Wedman, John. (1986). Making Software More Useful. The Computing teacher. 14(3). 11–14.3 indexed citations
19.
Wedman, John & Greg P. Stefanich. (1984). Guidelines for Computer-Based Testing of Student Learning of Concepts, Principles, and Procedures.. Educational Technology archive. 24(6). 23–28.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.