Nian‐Shing Chen

12.0k total citations · 3 hit papers
230 papers, 7.9k citations indexed

About

Nian‐Shing Chen is a scholar working on Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Information Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, Nian‐Shing Chen has authored 230 papers receiving a total of 7.9k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 94 papers in Education, 94 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 64 papers in Information Systems. Recurrent topics in Nian‐Shing Chen's work include Online and Blended Learning (62 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (57 papers) and Mobile Learning in Education (37 papers). Nian‐Shing Chen is often cited by papers focused on Online and Blended Learning (62 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (57 papers) and Mobile Learning in Education (37 papers). Nian‐Shing Chen collaborates with scholars based in Taiwan, Canada and China. Nian‐Shing Chen's co-authors include Kinshuk Kinshuk, Gwo‐Jen Hwang, Chun‐Wang Wei, Bing Xu, Yu‐Ping Wang, I‐Chun Hung, Manli Lu, Guang Chen, Benazir Quadir and Wei‐Chieh Fang and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Computers in Human Behavior and Expert Systems with Applications.

In The Last Decade

Nian‐Shing Chen

223 papers receiving 7.3k citations

Hit Papers

Is FLIP enough? Or should... 2014 2026 2018 2022 2014 2018 2020 100 200 300 400

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Nian‐Shing Chen 3.7k 2.4k 2.2k 1.7k 928 230 7.9k
Kinshuk Kinshuk 3.0k 0.8× 2.5k 1.1× 2.2k 1.0× 2.2k 1.3× 1.1k 1.2× 315 7.9k
Jeremy Roschelle 3.5k 0.9× 1.8k 0.7× 2.8k 1.3× 1.1k 0.7× 423 0.5× 120 6.0k
Ching Sing Chai 7.5k 2.0× 3.3k 1.4× 2.9k 1.3× 2.6k 1.5× 1.3k 1.4× 256 12.9k
Mike Sharples 2.2k 0.6× 3.5k 1.5× 1.4k 0.6× 1.0k 0.6× 542 0.6× 169 6.2k
Khe Foon Hew 7.0k 1.9× 2.4k 1.0× 3.4k 1.6× 3.3k 1.9× 1.0k 1.1× 178 12.0k
Mark Guzdial 3.6k 1.0× 2.0k 0.8× 4.2k 1.9× 6.0k 3.5× 877 0.9× 307 10.8k
Roy Pea 5.2k 1.4× 1.8k 0.8× 5.6k 2.6× 3.8k 2.2× 806 0.9× 176 12.4k
Miguél Nussbaum 2.3k 0.6× 1.9k 0.8× 2.1k 1.0× 1.1k 0.6× 318 0.3× 162 5.2k
Pierre Dillenbourg 2.8k 0.8× 1.4k 0.6× 3.7k 1.7× 2.5k 1.4× 1.5k 1.6× 322 8.7k
Ton de Jong 5.5k 1.5× 1.1k 0.5× 4.9k 2.3× 1.3k 0.8× 1.0k 1.1× 217 10.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Nian‐Shing Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nian‐Shing Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nian‐Shing Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nian‐Shing Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nian‐Shing Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nian‐Shing Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nian‐Shing Chen. The network helps show where Nian‐Shing Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nian‐Shing Chen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nian‐Shing Chen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nian‐Shing Chen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nian‐Shing Chen. Nian‐Shing Chen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
3.
Huang, Changqin, Jianhui Yu, Fei Wu, Yi Wang, & Nian‐Shing Chen. (2024). Uncovering emotion sequence patterns in different interaction groups using deep learning and sequential pattern mining. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 40(4). 1777–1790. 3 indexed citations
5.
Denden, Mouna, Ahmed Tlili, Nian‐Shing Chen, et al.. (2022). The role of learners’ characteristics in educational gamification systems: a systematic meta-review of the literature. Interactive Learning Environments. 32(3). 790–812. 18 indexed citations
6.
Yang, Stephen J.H., Hiroaki Ogata, Tatsunori Matsui, & Nian‐Shing Chen. (2021). Human-centered artificial intelligence in education: Seeing the invisible through the visible. Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence. 2. 100008–100008. 193 indexed citations
7.
Denden, Mouna, Ahmed Tlili, Fathi Essalmi, et al.. (2021). Effects of gender and personality differences on students’ perception of game design elements in educational gamification. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 154. 102674–102674. 62 indexed citations
8.
Zhai, Xuesong, Minjuan Wang, Nian‐Shing Chen, Usman Ghani, & Luca Cacciolatti. (2021). The secret thoughts of social network sites users: a scale for the measurement of online knowledge-hiding in a knowledge exchange (KE) context. Interactive Learning Environments. 1–15. 8 indexed citations
9.
Tlili, Ahmed, Vivien Lin, Nian‐Shing Chen, Ronghuai Huang, & Kinshuk Kinshuk. (2020). A Systematic Review on Robot-Assisted Special Education from the Activity Theory Perspective. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 24 indexed citations
10.
Lee, Duan‐Shin, et al.. (2020). The effect of a badminton teaching system using Kinect on badminton skill performance. 53(2). 161–178. 5 indexed citations
11.
Lin, Vivien, Gi‐Zen Liu, Gwo‐Jen Hwang, Nian‐Shing Chen, & Chengjiu Yin. (2019). Outcomes-based appropriation of context-aware ubiquitous technology across educational levels. Interactive Learning Environments. 30(8). 1515–1538. 27 indexed citations
12.
Tlili, Ahmed, Mouna Denden, Fathi Essalmi, et al.. (2019). Automatic modeling learner’s personality using learning analytics approach in an intelligent Moodle learning platform. Interactive Learning Environments. 31(5). 2529–2543. 33 indexed citations
13.
Quadir, Benazir, Jie Chi Yang, & Nian‐Shing Chen. (2019). The effects of interaction types on learning outcomes in a blog-based interactive learning environment. Interactive Learning Environments. 30(2). 293–306. 48 indexed citations
14.
Essalmi, Fathi, et al.. (2016). Relationship between learning styles and genres of games. Computers & Education. 101. 1–14. 39 indexed citations
15.
Quadir, Benazir & Nian‐Shing Chen. (2015). The effects of reading and writing habits on blog adoption. Behaviour and Information Technology. 34(9). 893–901. 13 indexed citations
16.
Zervas, Panagiotis, et al.. (2014). Studying Research Collaboration Patterns via Co-authorship Analysis in the Field of TeL: The Case of "Educational Technology & Society" Journal.. Educational Technology & Society. 17(4). 1–16. 11 indexed citations
17.
Hwang, Wu‐Yuin, et al.. (2010). A study of speech to text recognition and its effect to synchronous learning. EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology. 2010(1). 546–555. 9 indexed citations
18.
Chen, Nian‐Shing & Yu‐Ping Wang. (2008). Testing Principles of Language Learning in a Cyber Face-to-Face Environment. Educational Technology & Society. 11(3). 97–113. 35 indexed citations
19.
Chen, Nian‐Shing, et al.. (2007). Instructional Design for Best Practice in the Synchronous Cyber Classroom. Educational Technology & Society. 10(4). 281–294. 41 indexed citations
20.
Chen, Nian‐Shing, et al.. (2007). Cyber schooling framework:Improving mobility and situated learning. International journal of engineering education. 23(3). 421–433. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026