Countries where authors publish in Educational Philosophy and Theory
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Educational Philosophy and Theory. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Educational Philosophy and Theory with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Educational Philosophy and Theory more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Educational Philosophy and Theory
This network shows the impact of papers published in Educational Philosophy and Theory. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Educational Philosophy and Theory.
About Educational Philosophy and Theory
The 2.7k papers published in Educational Philosophy and Theory in the last decades have received a total of 29.2k indexed citations . Papers published in Educational Philosophy and Theory usually cover Philosophy (645 papers), Education (1.2k papers) and Human Factors and Ergonomics (69 papers) specifically the topics of Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (328 papers), Education and Critical Thinking Development (327 papers), Global Educational Policies and Reforms (278 papers), Religious Education and Schools (197 papers), Critical and Liberation Pedagogy (183 papers), Global Education and Multiculturalism (176 papers), Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education (158 papers) and Digital Education and Society (140 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Educational Philosophy and Theory are Michael A. Peters, Zeus Leonardo, Mark Mason, Gert Biesta, Derek R. Ford, Gloria Dall’Alba, David Kirk, Henry A. Giroux, Linda J. Graham and Steven A. Stolz.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.