Cultural Studies

264.8k papers and 1.7M indexed citations i.

About

264.8k papers covering Cultural Studies have received a total of 1.7M indexed citations since 1950. Papers on subfields are most often about the specific topic of Japanese History and Culture, Latin American and Latino Studies and Diverse Topics in Contemporary Research and also cover the fields of Sociology and Political Science, Literature and Literary Theory and Anthropology. Papers citing papers on subfields are usually about Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology and Political Science and International Relations. Some of the most active scholars covering Cultural Studies are Jeffrey L. Elman, Noam Chomsky, Joseph Henrich, Karen Barad, Katharine A. Phillips, Robin Dunbar, Kevin N. Laland, Stephen C. Levinson, Ray Jackendoff and Steven Pinker.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers citing papers about Cultural Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers covering Cultural Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers covering Cultural Studies.

Countries where authors publish papers about Cultural Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research in Cultural Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers about Cultural Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cultural Studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore fields with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025