Qualitative Inquiry
About
In The Last Decade
Qualitative Inquiry
2.0k papers receiving 49.5k citations
Fields of papers published in Qualitative Inquiry
This network shows the impact of papers published in Qualitative Inquiry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Qualitative Inquiry.
Countries where authors publish in Qualitative Inquiry
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Qualitative Inquiry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Qualitative Inquiry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Qualitative Inquiry more than expected).
- Qualitative Quality: Eight “Big-Tent” Criteria for Excellent Qualitative Research (2010)
- Critical Race Methodology: Counter-Storytelling as an Analytical Framework for Education Research (2002)
- Ethics, Reflexivity, and “Ethically Important Moments” in Research (2004)
- Emerging Criteria for Quality in Qualitative and Interpretive Research (1995)
- Quality in Qualitative Research (1999)
- Performing Autoethnography: An Embodied Methodological Praxis (2001)
- The Social Construction of Validity (1995)
- Dominance Through Interviews and Dialogues (2006)
- Kundera's Immortality: The Interview Society and the Invention of the Self (1997)
- That Rare Feeling: Re-presenting Research Through Poetic Transcription (1997)
- Critical Communicative Methodology: Informing Real Social Transformation Through Research (2011)
- It's About Time: Narrative and the Divided Self (1997)
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.