Melih Elçin

805 total citations
61 papers, 551 citations indexed

About

Melih Elçin is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Physiology and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Melih Elçin has authored 61 papers receiving a total of 551 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 28 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 23 papers in Physiology and 18 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Melih Elçin's work include Innovations in Medical Education (25 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (23 papers) and Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (8 papers). Melih Elçin is often cited by papers focused on Innovations in Medical Education (25 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (23 papers) and Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (8 papers). Melih Elçin collaborates with scholars based in Türkiye, United States and United Kingdom. Melih Elçin's co-authors include Leyla Dinç, Hilal Tüzer, Sevgi Turan, Celale Tangül Özcan, İskender Sayek, Barış Sezer, Sarp Üner, Bülent Erbil, Fatma Uslu-Şahan and Nilgün Kuru Alıcı and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Medical Education and Patient Education and Counseling.

In The Last Decade

Melih Elçin

55 papers receiving 506 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Melih Elçin Türkiye 12 247 211 169 86 70 61 551
Margory A. Molloy United States 14 309 1.3× 214 1.0× 218 1.3× 76 0.9× 93 1.3× 39 648
Jin‐Hwa Park South Korea 6 313 1.3× 150 0.7× 154 0.9× 64 0.7× 84 1.2× 19 507
Danielle Noble Australia 8 367 1.5× 245 1.2× 165 1.0× 151 1.8× 108 1.5× 12 696
Dawn Taylor Peterson United States 14 271 1.1× 211 1.0× 189 1.1× 50 0.6× 68 1.0× 39 576
Timothy C. Clapper United States 12 264 1.1× 162 0.8× 111 0.7× 113 1.3× 146 2.1× 45 546
Albert Scherpbier Netherlands 15 234 0.9× 235 1.1× 117 0.7× 52 0.6× 124 1.8× 24 645
Matthew Charnetski United States 7 514 2.1× 218 1.0× 192 1.1× 105 1.2× 112 1.6× 13 627
Carol F. Durham United States 16 418 1.7× 290 1.4× 267 1.6× 100 1.2× 157 2.2× 30 782
Carol Norton Australia 8 213 0.9× 199 0.9× 150 0.9× 156 1.8× 100 1.4× 10 602
Patrea Andersen Australia 15 232 0.9× 159 0.8× 176 1.0× 80 0.9× 113 1.6× 64 551

Countries citing papers authored by Melih Elçin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Melih Elçin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Melih Elçin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Melih Elçin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Melih Elçin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Melih Elçin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Melih Elçin. The network helps show where Melih Elçin may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Melih Elçin

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Melih Elçin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Melih Elçin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Melih Elçin. Melih Elçin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Doğu, Özlem, et al.. (2024). Use of different debriefing methods after in situ simulation with intensive care unit nurses. Nursing in Critical Care. 29(5). 953–961. 2 indexed citations
2.
Assa, Solmaz, Cadja Bachmann, Wei Chen, et al.. (2024). Medical Care as Flea Market Bargaining? An International Interdisciplinary Study of Varieties of Shared Decision Making in Physician–Patient Interactions. Teaching and Learning in Medicine. 37(2). 192–204.
3.
Elçin, Melih, et al.. (2024). The experiences of cardiovascular surgeons and nurses with mutual support through interprofessional collaboration in the intensive care unit. Nursing in Critical Care. 30(4). e13220–e13220. 1 indexed citations
4.
Doyle, Andrea J., Melih Elçin, Nancy McNaughton, et al.. (2024). Call to Action. Simulation in Healthcare The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare. 20(4). 211–214. 2 indexed citations
6.
Elçin, Melih, et al.. (2023). MESLEKLER ARASI EĞİTİME GENÇ BAKIŞ: SİMÜLASYON UYGULAMASINA YÖNELİK ÖĞRENCİ GÖRÜŞLERİ. Ankara Universitesi Eczacilik Fakultesi Dergisi. 6–6. 1 indexed citations
7.
Assa, Solmaz, Cadja Bachmann, Wei Chen, et al.. (2023). Hearts in their hands—Physicians’ gestures embodying shared professional knowledge around the world. Sociology of Health & Illness. 45(5). 1101–1122. 1 indexed citations
8.
Elçin, Melih, et al.. (2022). COVID-19 Pandemic Experiences of Residents: A Qualitative Study. Tıp Eğitimi Dünyası. 21(64). 91–108. 1 indexed citations
9.
Elçin, Melih, Barış Sezer, Meral Demirören, et al.. (2021). Hacettepe Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi’nin COVID-19 Pandemi Deneyimi. Tıp Eğitimi Dünyası. 20(60-1). 125–130.
10.
Sezer, Barış, et al.. (2021). Exploring spatial ability in healthcare students and the relationship to training with virtual and actual objects. European Journal Of Dental Education. 26(2). 310–316. 4 indexed citations
11.
Elçin, Melih, et al.. (2020). Pediatric Severe Burn Moulage: Recipe and Evaluation from the Burn Team. Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 49. 32–39. 6 indexed citations
12.
Turan, Sevgi, et al.. (2020). Learning approach preferences of medical students in different grades. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 45(3). 1051–1060.
13.
Elçin, Melih, et al.. (2019). Dundee Mevcut Eğitim Ortamı Değerlendirme Ölçeği (DREEM-TR): Türkçe Uyarlama Çalışması. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 18(56). 16–29. 1 indexed citations
14.
Elçin, Melih, et al.. (2017). A review of simulation-enhanced, team-based cardiopulmonary resuscitation training for undergraduate students. Nurse Education in Practice. 27. 134–143. 29 indexed citations
15.
Özcan, Celale Tangül, et al.. (2017). The impact of using standardized patients in psychiatric cases on the levels of motivation and perceived learning of the nursing students. Nurse Education Today. 51. 15–22. 48 indexed citations
16.
Dinç, Leyla, et al.. (2016). Success of the First Gynecological Teaching Associate Program in Turkey. Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 12(8). 305–312. 3 indexed citations
17.
Dinç, Leyla, et al.. (2016). Hemşirelik Öğrencilerinin Klinik Beceri Eğitimlerinde Kullanılan Standart Hasta ve Maketlere İlişkin Görüşleri. 13(2). 107–115. 4 indexed citations
18.
Terzioğlu, Füsun, et al.. (2012). DEVELOPMENT, VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF PATIENT INTERVENTION SELF CONFIDENCE/COMPETENCE SCALE IN SIMULATION EDUCATION IN TURKEY. 5230–5232. 2 indexed citations
19.
Turan, Sevgi, Sarp Üner, & Melih Elçin. (2011). The Impact of Standardized Patient Feedback on Student Motivational Levels. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 8 indexed citations
20.
Turan, Sevgi, et al.. (2007). TIP FAKÜLTELERİNDE KLİNİK ÖNCESİ DÖNEMDE ARAŞTIRMA EĞİTİM. DergiPark (Istanbul University). 26(26). 23–31. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026