Academic Psychiatry

2.6k papers and 29.7k indexed citations

About

The 2.6k papers published in Academic Psychiatry in the last decades have received a total of 29.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Academic Psychiatry usually cover Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (1.2k papers), General Health Professions (965 papers) and Social Psychology (580 papers) specifically the topics of Innovations in Medical Education (907 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (355 papers) and Medical Education and Admissions (315 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Academic Psychiatry are Laura Weiss Roberts, Shahm Martini, Joel Yager, John Coverdale, Frederick Sierles, Richard Balon, Christine Moutier, Woo Jin Kim, Glen O. Gabbard and Laura B. Dunn.

In The Last Decade

Academic Psychiatry

2.4k papers receiving 27.7k citations

Countries where authors publish in Academic Psychiatry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Academic Psychiatry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Academic Psychiatry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Academic Psychiatry more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Academic Psychiatry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Academic Psychiatry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Academic Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026