Diana Tabak
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 5%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Physiology
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health top 10%
- Finance top 5%
- Co-authors
- Brian T. ChanAlaka HollaManoj MohananVeena DasJishnu DasZubin AustinDebra NestelPaul Gregory
- Topics
- Innovations in Medical Education (14 papers)Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (7 papers)Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited KingdomAustralia
In The Last Decade
Diana Tabak
19 papers receiving 666 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 348
- General Health Professions 286
- Physiology 168
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 136
- Finance 116
Countries citing papers authored by Diana Tabak
This map shows the geographic impact of Diana Tabak's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diana Tabak with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diana Tabak more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Diana Tabak
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diana Tabak. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diana Tabak. The network helps show where Diana Tabak may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Diana Tabak
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Diana Tabak. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Diana Tabak based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Diana Tabak. Diana Tabak is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Teaching Primary Care Genetics: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparison. | 8 |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 283 | |
| 4 | 40 | |
| 5 | 34 | |
| 6 | 11 | |
| 7 | 49 | |
| 8 | 61 | |
| 9 | 65 | |
| 10 | 12 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 68 | |
| 14 | INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN AND ASSESSMENT Simulated Patients vs. Standardized Patients in Objective Structured Clinical Examinations | 2 |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | 26 | |
| 17 | 20 | |
| 18 | 17 | |
| 19 | 4 |
About Diana Tabak
Diana Tabak is a scholar working on Family Practice, Geriatrics and Gerontology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 19 papers that have together received 710 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (14 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (7 papers) and Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (104 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (61 citations) and Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (25 citations). Diana Tabak has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Brian T. Chan, Alaka Holla, Manoj Mohanan, Veena Das, Jishnu Das, Zubin Austin, Debra Nestel, Paul Gregory, Roger Kneebone and Helen MacRae. Their work appears in journals such as Health Affairs, Academic Medicine and The American Journal of Surgery.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.