Nadia Boussetta
Impact in
- Biochemistry top 0.1%
- Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
- Biotechnology top 0.1%
- Microbial Inactivation Methods
Papers in
-
- Microbial Inactivation Methods 31
- Food Science 24
- Fermentation and Sensory Analysis 9
- Botanical Research and Applications 5
- Co-authors
- Eugène Vorobiev (31 shared papers)Nabil Grimi (26 shared papers)Francisco J. Barba (9 shared papers)Eugène Vorobiev (17 shared papers)Nikolaï Lebovka (16 shared papers)Richard G. Maroun (12 shared papers)Hiba N. Rajha (12 shared papers)Nicolas Louka (12 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Nadia Boussetta
72 papers receiving 4.4k citations
Nadia Boussetta's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 128
- Biochemistry 1.5k
- Biotechnology 1.5k
- Food Science 1.8k
- Physiology 431
- Filtration and Separation 96
Countries citing papers authored by Nadia Boussetta
This map shows the geographic impact of Nadia Boussetta's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nadia Boussetta with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nadia Boussetta more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nadia Boussetta
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nadia Boussetta. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nadia Boussetta. The network helps show where Nadia Boussetta may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nadia Boussetta, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 74 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Current applications and new opportunities for the use of pulsed electric fields in food science and industry Hit paper breakdown → | 2015 | 488 |
| 2 | 2015 | 233 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 190 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 185 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 170 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 143 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 136 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 125 | |
| 9 | 2015 | 124 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 124 | |
| 11 | 2016 | 121 | |
| 12 | 2011 | 119 | |
| 13 | 2011 | 118 | |
| 14 | 2014 | 116 | |
| 15 | 2015 | 115 | |
| 16 | 2016 | 104 | |
| 17 | 2019 | 102 | |
| 18 | 2014 | 100 | |
| 19 | 2009 | 100 | |
| 20 | 2017 | 91 |
About Nadia Boussetta
Nadia Boussetta is a scholar working on Biotechnology, Food Science, Biochemistry, Biomedical Engineering and Plant Science, having authored 74 papers that have together received 4.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Microbial Inactivation Methods (31 papers), Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (23 papers), Magnetic and Electromagnetic Effects (9 papers), Fermentation and Sensory Analysis (9 papers), Lignin and Wood Chemistry (7 papers), Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management (7 papers), Biofuel production and bioconversion (7 papers) and Botanical Research and Applications (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (1.5k citations), Biotechnology (1.5k citations), Food Science (1.8k citations), Physiology (431 citations) and Filtration and Separation (96 citations). Nadia Boussetta has collaborated with scholars based in France, Ukraine and Lebanon. Frequent co-authors include Eugène Vorobiev, Nabil Grimi, Francisco J. Barba, Eugène Vorobiev, Nikolaï Lebovka, Richard G. Maroun, Hiba N. Rajha, Nicolas Louka, Jean‐Louis Lanoisellé and Amine Moubarik. Their work appears in journals such as Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies, Food Research International, Industrial Crops and Products, Ultrasonics Sonochemistry and Foods.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.