Michael F. Hock

34 total papers · 943 total citations
25 papers, 595 citations indexed

About

Michael F. Hock is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education and Safety Research. According to data from OpenAlex, Michael F. Hock has authored 25 papers receiving a total of 595 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 10 papers in Education and 8 papers in Safety Research. Recurrent topics in Michael F. Hock's work include Reading and Literacy Development (12 papers), Disability Education and Employment (8 papers) and Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (5 papers). Michael F. Hock is often cited by papers focused on Reading and Literacy Development (12 papers), Disability Education and Employment (8 papers) and Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (5 papers). Michael F. Hock collaborates with scholars based in United States. Michael F. Hock's co-authors include Donald D. Deshler, Jean B. Schumaker, Janis A. Bulgren, Jim Knight, B. Keith Lenz, Michael J. Kieffer, Gina Biancarosa, Barbara J. Ehren, Janet Marquis and Hugh W. Catts and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Learning Disabilities and Learning and Individual Differences.

In The Last Decade

Michael F. Hock

23 papers receiving 484 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Michael F. Hock 380 338 118 114 49 25 595
Mary Beth Calhoon 453 1.2× 388 1.1× 203 1.7× 94 0.8× 36 0.7× 27 620
Laura Sáenz 485 1.3× 441 1.3× 82 0.7× 58 0.5× 46 0.9× 18 675
Stefan Gustafson 388 1.0× 276 0.8× 132 1.1× 48 0.4× 49 1.0× 33 673
Orly Lipka 432 1.1× 236 0.7× 152 1.3× 81 0.7× 35 0.7× 28 608
Meenakshi Gajria 423 1.1× 315 0.9× 120 1.0× 95 0.8× 30 0.6× 13 591
Jan E. Hasbrouck 478 1.3× 336 1.0× 169 1.4× 48 0.4× 24 0.5× 21 582
Joseph Betts 346 0.9× 291 0.9× 132 1.1× 62 0.5× 19 0.4× 12 509
Lindy Crawford 227 0.6× 366 1.1× 80 0.7× 75 0.7× 70 1.4× 30 534
Berttram Chiang 402 1.1× 256 0.8× 174 1.5× 85 0.7× 18 0.4× 15 508
Gregory F. Harper 435 1.1× 418 1.2× 71 0.6× 159 1.4× 28 0.6× 27 687

Countries citing papers authored by Michael F. Hock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael F. Hock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael F. Hock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael F. Hock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael F. Hock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael F. Hock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael F. Hock. The network helps show where Michael F. Hock may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael F. Hock

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael F. Hock. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael F. Hock based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael F. Hock. Michael F. Hock is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026