Leonie Heres

549 citations
13 papers · 315 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Leonie Heres

13 papers receiving 284 citations

Peers

Leonie Heres
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Information Systems and Management 91
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 120
  • Public Administration 39
  • Strategy and Management 73
  • Gender Studies 38
Replace Daniel King with:
Daniel King United Kingdom
Nathalie van Meurs United Kingdom
Eduardo Davel Brazil
Ilias Kapoutsis Greece
Matthew J. Brannan United Kingdom
Kate E. Horton Netherlands
Shawnta S. Friday United States
Helen Delaney New Zealand
Joy H. Karriker United States
Albert J. Mills Canada
Leonie Heres relative to Daniel King United Kingdom Daniel King's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Daniel King · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Leonie Heres

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Leonie Heres's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Leonie Heres with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leonie Heres more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Leonie Heres

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Leonie Heres. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Leonie Heres. The network helps show where Leonie Heres may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Leonie Heres, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Leonie Heres Line = papers co-authored together Leonie Heres links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 201173
2
Ethical leadership and trust: It's all about meeting expectations
200961
3 201259
4 201236
5 201031
6 200020
7 202115
8 20196
9 20215
10
What makes the difference? Ethical leadership across the public-private continuum
20103
11 20203
12 20172
13 20231

About Leonie Heres

Leonie Heres is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Information Systems and Management, Sociology and Political Science, Strategy and Management and Demography, having authored 13 papers that have together received 315 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in Business and Education (6 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (6 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (2 papers), Family Business Performance and Succession (1 paper), Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research (1 paper), Corruption and Economic Development (1 paper), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (1 paper) and Workplace Spirituality and Leadership (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Information Systems and Management (91 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (120 citations), Public Administration (39 citations), Strategy and Management (73 citations) and Gender Studies (38 citations). Leonie Heres has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Belgium and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Karin Lasthuizen, L.W.J.C. Huberts, Yvonne Benschop, Frédérique Six, F.J.C.M. van Eerdenburg, S.J. Dieleman, Frank den Hond, Béatrice van der Heijden, Monique Veld and Bram Constandt. Their work appears in journals such as Public Management Review, Public Integrity, Equality Diversity and Inclusion An International Journal, Veterinary Quarterly and Human Resource Development Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact