Helen Delaney
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Gender Studies top 10%
- Management of Technology and Innovation top 10%
- Strategy and Management
- Co-authors
- Nick ButlerSverre SpoelstraKatie SullivanCatherine CaseyJim McKennaAntje FiedlerMartyna Śliwa
- Topics
- Labor Movements and Unions (4 papers)Management and Organizational Studies (4 papers)Ethics in Business and Education (3 papers)
- Cited by
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource ManagementGender StudiesManagement of Technology and Innovation
- Partner nations
- New ZealandSwedenUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Helen Delaney
15 papers receiving 275 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 116
- Sociology and Political Science 66
- Gender Studies 64
- Management of Technology and Innovation 31
- Strategy and Management 28
Countries citing papers authored by Helen Delaney
This map shows the geographic impact of Helen Delaney's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Helen Delaney with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Helen Delaney more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Helen Delaney
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Helen Delaney. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Helen Delaney. The network helps show where Helen Delaney may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Helen Delaney
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Helen Delaney. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Helen Delaney based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Helen Delaney. Helen Delaney is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 16 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 12 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 21 | |
| 10 | The labour of academia | 4 |
| 11 | 26 | |
| 12 | 72 | |
| 13 | 56 | |
| 14 | 43 | |
| 15 | Transformational leadership: secularized theology? | 2 |
| 16 | 7 |
About Helen Delaney
Helen Delaney is a scholar working on Public Administration, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Information Systems and Management, having authored 16 papers that have together received 286 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Labor Movements and Unions (4 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (4 papers) and Ethics in Business and Education (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (116 citations), Gender Studies (64 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (31 citations). Helen Delaney has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, Sweden and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Nick Butler, Sverre Spoelstra, Katie Sullivan, Catherine Casey, Jim McKenna, Antje Fiedler and Martyna Śliwa. Their work appears in journals such as Human Relations, British Journal of Management and Organization.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.