Rick T. Borst

791 total citations
19 papers, 536 citations indexed

About

Rick T. Borst is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Public Administration and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Rick T. Borst has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 536 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, 10 papers in Public Administration and 6 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Rick T. Borst's work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (11 papers), Public Policy and Administration Research (10 papers) and Work-Family Balance Challenges (4 papers). Rick T. Borst is often cited by papers focused on Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (11 papers), Public Policy and Administration Research (10 papers) and Work-Family Balance Challenges (4 papers). Rick T. Borst collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Belgium and United Kingdom. Rick T. Borst's co-authors include C.J. Lako, Peter M. Kruyen, Michiel S. de Vries, Bart Voorn, Eva Knies, Elaine Farndale, Peter Leisink, Albert Meijer, Jan-Kees Helderman and Béatrice van der Heijden and has published in prestigious journals such as Public Management Review, Human Resource Management Journal and International Journal of Public Sector Management.

In The Last Decade

Rick T. Borst

15 papers receiving 516 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Rick T. Borst Netherlands 10 377 156 122 116 105 19 536
Wisanupong Potipiroon Thailand 12 251 0.7× 140 0.9× 89 0.7× 71 0.6× 50 0.5× 33 453
Donna Maree Buttigieg Australia 10 310 0.8× 143 0.9× 111 0.9× 91 0.8× 107 1.0× 26 510
Paula K. Mowbray Australia 11 282 0.7× 179 1.1× 60 0.5× 100 0.9× 75 0.7× 20 491
Thomas Van Waeyenberg Belgium 10 295 0.8× 68 0.4× 33 0.3× 80 0.7× 57 0.5× 15 483
Nina van Loon Netherlands 12 316 0.8× 226 1.4× 304 2.5× 49 0.4× 65 0.6× 15 594
Sarah Proctor-Thomson New Zealand 8 270 0.7× 162 1.0× 40 0.3× 80 0.7× 44 0.4× 17 516
Jane Parker New Zealand 12 150 0.4× 186 1.2× 118 1.0× 75 0.6× 165 1.6× 50 505
Laurel R. Goulet United States 5 313 0.8× 101 0.6× 32 0.3× 90 0.8× 40 0.4× 10 459
Rusi Sun United States 7 197 0.5× 83 0.5× 95 0.8× 35 0.3× 30 0.3× 10 352
Nathanael S. Campbell United States 4 494 1.3× 196 1.3× 22 0.2× 162 1.4× 104 1.0× 6 645

Countries citing papers authored by Rick T. Borst

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rick T. Borst's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rick T. Borst with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rick T. Borst more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rick T. Borst

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rick T. Borst. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rick T. Borst. The network helps show where Rick T. Borst may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rick T. Borst

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rick T. Borst. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rick T. Borst based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rick T. Borst. Rick T. Borst is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
2.
Voorn, Bart, et al.. (2023). The Public Service Priorities of Public Managers in Agencies and Corporations. Academy of Management Proceedings. 2023(1).
3.
Kruyen, Peter M., et al.. (2023). Homeworking Heaven or Hell During the COVID-19 Pandemic? Lessons for the Job Demands-Resources Model in the Context of Homeworking. Review of Public Personnel Administration. 44(4). 790–820. 3 indexed citations
4.
Borst, Rick T., et al.. (2023). Comparing the Employability of Public and Private Employees: Studying the Role of PSM and Red Tape. Academy of Management Proceedings. 2023(1). 1 indexed citations
5.
Loyens, Kim, Rick T. Borst, & Leonie Heres. (2023). Understanding the moral myopia and ambiguity of post-employment conflicts of interest: comparing police to other public and private organizations. Public Management Review. 25(9). 1685–1710. 1 indexed citations
6.
Knies, Eva, Rick T. Borst, Peter Leisink, & Elaine Farndale. (2022). The distinctiveness of public sector HRM: A four‐wave trend analysis. Human Resource Management Journal. 32(4). 799–825. 24 indexed citations
7.
Borst, Rick T., et al.. (2022). Hybrid Data Competencies for Municipal Civil Servants: An Empirical Analysis of the Required Competencies for Data-Driven Decision-Making. Public Personnel Management. 51(4). 458–490. 13 indexed citations
8.
Borst, Rick T., et al.. (2022). Stressed out public servants? Testing the stress appraisal of psychological and emotional stressors on stress reactions through psychological capital. International Journal of Public Sector Management. 35(2). 113–132. 4 indexed citations
9.
Voorn, Bart, et al.. (2022). HRM autonomy, integration and performance in government agencies: tests of necessity and sufficiency. Public Management Review. 26(5). 1223–1241. 10 indexed citations
10.
Borst, Rick T. & Eva Knies. (2021). Well-Being of Public Servants Under Pressure: The Roles of Job Demands and Personality Traits in the Health-Impairment Process. Review of Public Personnel Administration. 43(1). 159–184. 20 indexed citations
11.
Borst, Rick T., et al.. (2020). Pathology or Inconvenience? A Meta-Analysis of the Impact of Red Tape on People and Organizations. Review of Public Personnel Administration. 41(4). 623–650. 42 indexed citations
12.
Voorn, Bart, et al.. (2020). Business techniques as an explanation of the autonomy-performance link in corporatized entities: evidence from Dutch Municipally owned corporations. International Public Management Journal. 25(5). 660–676. 14 indexed citations
13.
Kruyen, Peter M., et al.. (2019). Searching for the renaissance bureaucrat. International Journal of Public Sector Management. 33(1). 22–44. 9 indexed citations
15.
Borst, Rick T., Peter M. Kruyen, C.J. Lako, & Michiel S. de Vries. (2019). The Attitudinal, Behavioral, and Performance Outcomes of Work Engagement: A Comparative Meta-Analysis Across the Public, Semipublic, and Private Sector. Review of Public Personnel Administration. 40(4). 613–640. 134 indexed citations
17.
Borst, Rick T. & C.J. Lako. (2017). Proud to Be a Public Servant? An Analysis of the Work-Related Determinants of Professional Pride among Dutch Public Servants. International Journal of Public Administration. 40(10). 875–887. 12 indexed citations
18.
Borst, Rick T., Peter M. Kruyen, & C.J. Lako. (2017). Exploring the Job Demands–Resources Model of Work Engagement in Government: Bringing in a Psychological Perspective. Review of Public Personnel Administration. 39(3). 372–397. 165 indexed citations
19.
Borst, Rick T., C.J. Lako, & Michiel S. de Vries. (2014). Is Performance Measurement Applicable in the Public Sector? A Comparative Study of Attitudes among Dutch Officials. International Journal of Public Administration. 37(13). 922–931. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026