Veterinary Clinics of North America Food Animal Practice · 1×
×0.37k/21kACS
×0.76k/9kASZ
×0.46k/16kSA
×0.76k/8kID
×0.94k/5kEPIDE
Citations per year
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Countries where authors publish in Veterinary Quarterly
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Veterinary Quarterly. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Veterinary Quarterly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Veterinary Quarterly more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Veterinary Quarterly
This network shows the impact of papers published in Veterinary Quarterly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Veterinary Quarterly.
About Veterinary Quarterly
The 1.6k papers published in Veterinary Quarterly in the last decades have received a total of 30.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Veterinary Quarterly usually cover Equine (91 papers), Small Animals (352 papers) and Animal Science and Zoology (309 papers) specifically the topics of Microbial infections and disease research (136 papers), Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (129 papers) and Animal Virus Infections Studies (127 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Veterinary Quarterly are Kuldeep Dhama, Ruchi Tiwari, W. Misdorp, E. Gruys, R.J. Slappendel, Erik Teske, J.T. van Oirschot, J. F. M. Nouws, K. Huijps and H. Hogeveen.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.