Countries where authors publish in Public Management Review
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Public Management Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Public Management Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Public Management Review more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Public Management Review
This network shows the impact of papers published in Public Management Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Public Management Review.
About Public Management Review
The 1.8k papers published in Public Management Review in the last decades have received a total of 60.4k indexed citations . Papers published in Public Management Review usually cover Public Administration (911 papers), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (387 papers) and Strategy and Management (385 papers) specifically the topics of Public Policy and Administration Research (886 papers), Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering (310 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (192 papers), E-Government and Public Services (163 papers), Accounting and Organizational Management (145 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (138 papers), Local Government Finance and Decentralization (128 papers) and Public-Private Partnership Projects (128 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Public Management Review are Stephen P. Osborne, John M. Bryson, Victor Bekkers, Lars Tummers, Erik‐Hans Klijn, Jacob Torfing, Victor Pestoff, John Alford, Christopher Pollitt and Wouter Vandenabeele.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.