L. Peters

867 total citations
29 papers, 561 citations indexed

About

L. Peters is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Statistics and Probability and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, L. Peters has authored 29 papers receiving a total of 561 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 13 papers in Statistics and Probability and 9 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in L. Peters's work include Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (13 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (13 papers) and Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (7 papers). L. Peters is often cited by papers focused on Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (13 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (13 papers) and Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (7 papers). L. Peters collaborates with scholars based in Belgium, Canada and United States. L. Peters's co-authors include Bert De Smedt, Daniel Ansari, Hans Op de Beeck, Jessica Bulthé, Maaike Vandermosten, Nicky Daniëls, Pol Ghesquière, Eva Ceulemans, Lisa M. D. Archibald and Kiran Vanbinst and has published in prestigious journals such as NeuroImage, Neuropsychologia and Human Brain Mapping.

In The Last Decade

L. Peters

26 papers receiving 544 citations

Peers

L. Peters
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Statistics and Probability 384
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 344
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 243
  • Education 174
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 40
Replace Janosch Linkersdörfer with:
Janosch Linkersdörfer Germany
Sarah Wu United States
Anna A. Matejko Canada
Shelley Shaul Israel
David M. Gómez Chile
Sarah Clayton United Kingdom
Congying Sun United States
Pamela E. Hook United States
Stephanie Bugden Canada
Stephen C. Walker United States
Janosch Linkersdörfer Germany View profile →
Citations per field, relative to L. Peters
L. Peters · 1×
Citations per year, relative to L. Peters
L. Peters · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by L. Peters

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of L. Peters's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by L. Peters with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites L. Peters more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by L. Peters

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by L. Peters. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by L. Peters. The network helps show where L. Peters may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of L. Peters

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of L. Peters. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of L. Peters based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with L. Peters. L. Peters is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 3
2 2
3 8
4 6
5 8
6 11
7 20
8 12
9 34
10 10
11 11
12 93
13 54
14 157
15 24
16 24
17 16
18 8
19 1
20
Onderzoeksprogramma kwaliteit van zorg: de QUOTE-vragenlijsten: kwaliteit van zorg vanuit patiëntenperspectief: vier nieuwe meetinstrumenten.
6

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026