Crétien van Campen
- General Health Professions top 2%
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Co-authors
- H. SixmaJan J. KerssensJurjen IedemaR.D. FrieleM. CardolAda KerkstraIsolde WoittiezAlice H. de Boer
- Topics
- Health disparities and outcomes (10 papers)Healthcare innovation and challenges (9 papers)Dutch Social and Cultural Studies (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsHungaryUnited States
In The Last Decade
Crétien van Campen
43 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 127
- General Health Professions 694
- Economics and Econometrics 175
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 136
- Sociology and Political Science 131
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 124
Countries citing papers authored by Crétien van Campen
This map shows the geographic impact of Crétien van Campen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Crétien van Campen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Crétien van Campen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Crétien van Campen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Crétien van Campen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Crétien van Campen. The network helps show where Crétien van Campen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Crétien van Campen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Crétien van Campen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Crétien van Campen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Crétien van Campen. Crétien van Campen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 14 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 50 | |
| 6 | 41 | |
| 7 | 52 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | SCP-maat voor lichamelijke beperkingen op basis van AVO 2003 | 18 |
| 10 | 12 | |
| 11 | 36 | |
| 12 | 21 | |
| 13 | 36 | |
| 14 | 27 | |
| 15 | [Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI): a review of international research on the psychometric qualities and effects of implementation in nursing homes]. | 16 |
| 16 | 278 | |
| 17 | 87 | |
| 18 | 4 | |
| 19 | 38 | |
| 20 | 214 |
About Crétien van Campen
Crétien van Campen is a scholar working on General Psychology, Health and General Health Professions, having authored 48 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health disparities and outcomes (10 papers), Healthcare innovation and challenges (9 papers) and Dutch Social and Cultural Studies (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (694 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (136 citations) and Health (92 citations). Crétien van Campen has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Hungary and United States. Frequent co-authors include H. Sixma, Jan J. Kerssens, Jurjen Iedema, R.D. Friele, M. Cardol, Ada Kerkstra, Isolde Woittiez, Alice H. de Boer, Miel W. Ribbe and Edwin van Gameren. Their work appears in journals such as Social Science & Medicine, Journal of Advanced Nursing and Quality of Life Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.