Shelley Shaul
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 2%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Statistics and Probability top 2%
- Education top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Co-authors
- Mila SchwartzZvia BreznitzMichael NevatAvi KarniTami KatzirItamar SelaTzipi Horowitz‐KrausMaryanne Wolf
- Topics
- Reading and Literacy Development (31 papers)Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (28 papers)Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- IsraelNetherlandsUnited States
In The Last Decade
Shelley Shaul
36 papers receiving 529 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 414
- Cognitive Neuroscience 240
- Statistics and Probability 228
- Education 204
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 59
Countries citing papers authored by Shelley Shaul
This map shows the geographic impact of Shelley Shaul's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Shelley Shaul with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Shelley Shaul more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Shelley Shaul
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Shelley Shaul. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Shelley Shaul. The network helps show where Shelley Shaul may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Shelley Shaul
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Shelley Shaul. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Shelley Shaul based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Shelley Shaul. Shelley Shaul is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 20 | |
| 10 | 14 | |
| 11 | 8 | |
| 12 | A Comparative Study on Brain Activity Associated with Solving Short Problems in Algebra and Geometry. | 1 |
| 13 | 11 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 5 | |
| 17 | 74 | |
| 18 | 12 | |
| 19 | 5 | |
| 20 | 93 |
About Shelley Shaul
Shelley Shaul is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 41 papers that have together received 556 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reading and Literacy Development (31 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (28 papers) and Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (414 citations), Statistics and Probability (228 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (240 citations). Shelley Shaul has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include Mila Schwartz, Zvia Breznitz, Michael Nevat, Avi Karni, Tami Katzir, Itamar Sela, Tzipi Horowitz‐Kraus, Maryanne Wolf, Mark Leikin and Einat Nevo. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Communications, Frontiers in Psychology and Neuroreport.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.