Neuropsychologia

10.5k papers and 573.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 10.5k papers published in Neuropsychologia in the last decades have received a total of 573.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Neuropsychologia usually cover Cognitive Neuroscience (9.2k papers), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.9k papers) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (1.9k papers) specifically the topics of Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (2.5k papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (1.9k papers) and Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction (1.6k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Neuropsychologia are R. C. Oldfield, H. Hécaen, Anna Berti, Brenda Milner, Arthur L. Benton, Robert Dantzer, Yaakov Stern, M. P. Bryden, Elizabeth K. Warrington and Marc Jeannerod.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Neuropsychologia

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Neuropsychologia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Neuropsychologia.

Countries where authors publish in Neuropsychologia

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Neuropsychologia. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Neuropsychologia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neuropsychologia more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025