Human Brain Mapping

6.5k papers and 364.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 6.5k papers published in Human Brain Mapping in the last decades have received a total of 364.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Human Brain Mapping usually cover Cognitive Neuroscience (5.0k papers), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (2.2k papers) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (750 papers) specifically the topics of Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (3.1k papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (1.7k papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (1.5k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Human Brain Mapping are Stephen M. Smith, Karl Friston, Andrew P. Holmes, Thomas E. Nichols, Peter T. Fox, Anders M. Dale, R. S. J. Frackowiak, Keith J. Worsley, Vince D. Calhoun and Angela R. Laird.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Human Brain Mapping

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Human Brain Mapping. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Human Brain Mapping.

Countries where authors publish in Human Brain Mapping

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Human Brain Mapping. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Human Brain Mapping with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Human Brain Mapping more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025