K. F. Pocock
- Food Science top 0.5%
- Fermentation and Sensory Analysis 26
- Food Quality and Safety Studies 5
- Biochemistry top 2%
- Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities 4
- Animal Science and Zoology top 5%
- Meat and Animal Product Quality 7
- Plant Science top 5%
- Horticultural and Viticultural Research 17
- Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management 3
- Plant Surface Properties and Treatments 2
-
- Muscle metabolism and nutrition 2
- Co-authors
- Elizabeth J. WatersPatrick J. WilliamsYoji HayasakaZ. PENGMark A. SeftonPatrik R. JonesP. B. HøjB. C. Rankine
In The Last Decade
K. F. Pocock
31 papers receiving 1.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
- Food Science 926
- Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 59
- Biochemistry 186
- Animal Science and Zoology 204
- Plant Science 647
Countries citing papers authored by K. F. Pocock
This map shows the geographic impact of K. F. Pocock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by K. F. Pocock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites K. F. Pocock more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by K. F. Pocock
This network shows the impact of papers produced by K. F. Pocock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by K. F. Pocock. The network helps show where K. F. Pocock may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside K. F. Pocock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 17 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 5 | |
| 4 | 2011 | 38 | |
| 5 | 2007 | 67 | |
| 6 | 2006 | 54 | |
| 7 | 2006 | 82 | |
| 8 | 2004 | 32 | |
| 9 | Varietal differentiation of grape juices by protein fingerprinting | 2003 | 7 |
| 10 | 2001 | 40 | |
| 11 | 2000 | 74 | |
| 12 | 1998 | 32 | |
| 13 | 1997 | 38 | |
| 14 | The influences of oak, coopering heat and microbial activity on oak-derived wine aroma | 1996 | 7 |
| 15 | 1996 | 3 | |
| 16 | 1995 | 35 | |
| 17 | 1994 | 40 | |
| 18 | 1994 | 27 | |
| 19 | The influence of natural seasoning on the concentrations of eugenol, vanillin, and cis- and trans-β-methyl-γ-octalactone extracted from French and American oakwood | 1993 | 52 |
| 20 | 1982 | 13 |
About K. F. Pocock
K. F. Pocock is a scholar working on Food Science, Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management and Animal Science and Zoology, having authored 32 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fermentation and Sensory Analysis (26 papers), Horticultural and Viticultural Research (17 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (7 papers), Food Quality and Safety Studies (5 papers), Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (4 papers), Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management (3 papers), Plant Surface Properties and Treatments (2 papers) and Muscle metabolism and nutrition (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Food Science (926 citations), Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (59 citations) and Biochemistry (186 citations). K. F. Pocock has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Spain and Chile. Frequent co-authors include Elizabeth J. Waters, Patrick J. Williams, Yoji Hayasaka, Z. PENG, Mark A. Sefton, Patrik R. Jones, P. B. Høj, B. C. Rankine, Richard A. Muhlack and C. Colby. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology and Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.