Jack Ting‐Ju Chiang
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 2%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Demography top 10%
- Co-authors
- Haiyang LiuKai Chi YamRyan FehrJih‐Yu MaoAnthony C. KlotzJoel KoopmanAdam C. StoverinkSerge P. da Motta Veiga
- Topics
- Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (15 papers)Emotional Labor in Professions (4 papers)Work-Family Balance Challenges (4 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Applied PsychologyScientific ReportsOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
- Partner nations
- ChinaUnited StatesSingapore
In The Last Decade
Jack Ting‐Ju Chiang
25 papers receiving 610 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 359
- Social Psychology 277
- Sociology and Political Science 201
- Clinical Psychology 123
- Demography 62
Countries citing papers authored by Jack Ting‐Ju Chiang
This map shows the geographic impact of Jack Ting‐Ju Chiang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jack Ting‐Ju Chiang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jack Ting‐Ju Chiang more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jack Ting‐Ju Chiang
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jack Ting‐Ju Chiang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jack Ting‐Ju Chiang. The network helps show where Jack Ting‐Ju Chiang may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jack Ting‐Ju Chiang
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jack Ting‐Ju Chiang. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jack Ting‐Ju Chiang based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jack Ting‐Ju Chiang. Jack Ting‐Ju Chiang is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 14 | |
| 4 | 22 | |
| 5 | 20 | |
| 6 | 20 | |
| 7 | 25 | |
| 8 | 72 | |
| 9 | 0 | |
| 10 | 55 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 138 | |
| 13 | 33 | |
| 14 | 88 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 78 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Jack Ting‐Ju Chiang
Jack Ting‐Ju Chiang is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology and Applied Psychology, having authored 26 papers that have together received 630 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (15 papers), Emotional Labor in Professions (4 papers) and Work-Family Balance Challenges (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (359 citations), Social Psychology (277 citations) and Applied Psychology (54 citations). Jack Ting‐Ju Chiang has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Haiyang Liu, Kai Chi Yam, Ryan Fehr, Jih‐Yu Mao, Anthony C. Klotz, Joel Koopman, Adam C. Stoverink, Serge P. da Motta Veiga, Emilija Djurdjevic and Minya Xu. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Psychology, Scientific Reports and Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.