Elling‐Olav Rukke
- Food Science top 1%
- Molecular Biology
- Animal Science and Zoology top 2%
- Nutrition and Dietetics top 5%
- Analytical Chemistry top 2%
- Co-authors
- Tomas IsakssonSiv SkeieAnne‐Grethe JohansenRoger K. AbrahamsenElisabeth OlsenKristian Hovde LilandGerd E. VegarudDag Ekeberg
- Topics
- Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses (13 papers)Meat and Animal Product Quality (12 papers)Proteins in Food Systems (10 papers)
- Journals
- Applied and Environmental MicrobiologyJournal of Agricultural and Food ChemistryFood Chemistry
- Partner nations
- NorwayBelgiumBangladesh
In The Last Decade
Elling‐Olav Rukke
43 papers receiving 1.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
- Food Science 570
- Molecular Biology 253
- Animal Science and Zoology 243
- Nutrition and Dietetics 233
- Analytical Chemistry 165
Countries citing papers authored by Elling‐Olav Rukke
This map shows the geographic impact of Elling‐Olav Rukke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elling‐Olav Rukke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elling‐Olav Rukke more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Elling‐Olav Rukke
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elling‐Olav Rukke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elling‐Olav Rukke. The network helps show where Elling‐Olav Rukke may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elling‐Olav Rukke
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elling‐Olav Rukke. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elling‐Olav Rukke based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Elling‐Olav Rukke. Elling‐Olav Rukke is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | 59 | |
| 4 | 135 | |
| 5 | 16 | |
| 6 | 47 | |
| 7 | 38 | |
| 8 | 38 | |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | 9 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 27 | |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | 20 | |
| 15 | 17 | |
| 16 | 88 | |
| 17 | 6 | |
| 18 | 6 | |
| 19 | 22 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Elling‐Olav Rukke
Elling‐Olav Rukke is a scholar working on Analytical Chemistry, Biophysics and Animal Science and Zoology, having authored 44 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses (13 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (12 papers) and Proteins in Food Systems (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Food Science (570 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (243 citations) and Analytical Chemistry (165 citations). Elling‐Olav Rukke has collaborated with scholars based in Norway, Belgium and Bangladesh. Frequent co-authors include Tomas Isaksson, Siv Skeie, Anne‐Grethe Johansen, Roger K. Abrahamsen, Elisabeth Olsen, Kristian Hovde Liland, Gerd E. Vegarud, Dag Ekeberg, Reidar Barfod Schüller and Bjørge Westereng. Their work appears in journals such as Applied and Environmental Microbiology, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry and Food Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.