Analytical Chemistry

536.2k papers and 12.0M indexed citations i.

About

536.2k papers covering Analytical Chemistry have received a total of 12.0M indexed citations since 1950. Papers on subfields are most often about the specific topic of Analytical chemistry methods development, Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses and Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals and also cover the fields of Spectroscopy, Biomedical Engineering and Food Science. Papers citing papers on subfields are usually about Biomedical Engineering, Spectroscopy and Molecular Biology. Some of the most active scholars covering Analytical Chemistry are Joseph R. Lakowicz, Donald W. Marquardt, Janusz Pawliszyn, Svante Wold, Da‐Wen Sun, William S. Cleveland, ‪Damià Barceló, W. J. Geary, Mustafa Soylak and Paul Geladi.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers citing papers about Analytical Chemistry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers covering Analytical Chemistry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers covering Analytical Chemistry.

Countries where authors publish papers about Analytical Chemistry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research in Analytical Chemistry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers about Analytical Chemistry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Analytical Chemistry more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore fields with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025