Edwin Peel

678 citations
37 papers · 347 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Edwin Peel

32 papers receiving 247 citations

Peers

Edwin Peel
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 109
  • General Psychology 10
  • Education 139
  • Statistics and Probability 33
  • Applied Psychology 17
Replace Robert S. Soar with:
Robert S. Soar United States
Evan R. Keislar United States
Carl Braun Canada
Norman M. Chansky United States
Millie Almy United States
Jo Mary Rice United States
Christopher T. Ball United States
Jack P. Lipton United States
R. de Charms United States
Hazel Francis United Kingdom
Edwin Peel relative to Robert S. Soar United States Robert S. Soar's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Robert S. Soar · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Edwin Peel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Edwin Peel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edwin Peel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edwin Peel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Edwin Peel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edwin Peel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edwin Peel. The network helps show where Edwin Peel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Edwin Peel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Edwin Peel Line = papers co-authored together Edwin Peel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
The nature of adolescent judgment
197156
2 195945
3 196132
4 196730
5 196625
6 196325
7 196521
8
Properties of Law: Essays in Honour of Jim Harris
200613
9 19779
10 19519
11
Winfield & Jolowicz on Tort
20149
12 19549
13 19527
14 19757
15 19556
16 19725
17
Piaget, psychology and education : papers in honour of Jean Piaget
20074
18
Contract Formation and Parties
20104
19
Commercial remedies : current issues and problems
20033
20 19593

About Edwin Peel

Edwin Peel is a scholar working on Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Law, Political Science and International Relations and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 37 papers that have together received 347 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Educational and Psychological Assessments (6 papers), Parental Involvement in Education (4 papers), Legal principles and applications (4 papers), Education Methods and Practices (3 papers), European and International Contract Law (2 papers), Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (2 papers), Education and Technology Integration (2 papers) and Law, logistics, and international trade (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (109 citations), General Psychology (10 citations), Education (139 citations), Statistics and Probability (33 citations) and Applied Psychology (17 citations). Edwin Peel has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include John H. Flavell, Jean Piaget, Timothy Endicott, Lynn Michell, James Goudkamp, Andrew Burrows, C. A. Mace, Philip E. Vernon, George Butterworth and Maurice Chazan. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Educational Psychology, Educational Review, British Journal of Educational Studies, Journal of Research in Science Teaching and The Cambridge Law Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact