The Cambridge Law Journal

1.7k papers and 4.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.7k papers published in The Cambridge Law Journal in the last decades have received a total of 4.3k indexed citations. Papers published in The Cambridge Law Journal usually cover Law (942 papers), Political Science and International Relations (603 papers) and Economics and Econometrics (231 papers) specifically the topics of Legal principles and applications (613 papers), Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction (216 papers) and Development and Harmonization of European Private Law (197 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Cambridge Law Journal are Lord Bingham, Eugene V. Rostow, J. H. Baker, Julian Rivers, T. R. S. Allan, Philip Rumney, Catherine Barnard, Glanville Williams, B. Hepple and Alan Watson.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The Cambridge Law Journal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Cambridge Law Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Cambridge Law Journal.

Countries where authors publish in The Cambridge Law Journal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Cambridge Law Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Cambridge Law Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Cambridge Law Journal more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025