Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Curious Construct of Active Learning
2021202 citationsEdward E. Prather et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Edward E. Prather
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Edward E. Prather's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edward E. Prather with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edward E. Prather more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Edward E. Prather
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edward E. Prather. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edward E. Prather. The network helps show where Edward E. Prather may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Edward E. Prather
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Edward E. Prather.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Edward E. Prather based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Edward E. Prather. Edward E. Prather is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Chasteen, Stephanie V., Edward E. Prather, & Rachel E. Scherr. (2024). Embracing interactive teaching methods. Physics Today. 77(4). 30–36.1 indexed citations
Burd, Gail D., Debra Tomanek, Paul Blowers, et al.. (2015). Developing faculty cultures for evidence-based teaching practices in STEM: A progress report. 90–102.2 indexed citations
10.
Prather, Edward E., et al.. (2013). Introducing the AAS Astronomy Ambassadors Program. ASPC. 473. 351.1 indexed citations
Hornstein, S. D., et al.. (2011). Development and Testing of the Solar System Concept Inventory. AAS. 217.2 indexed citations
13.
Impey, C., et al.. (2010). The Center for Astronomy Education (CAE) and Our NSF Funded CCLI Phase III Collaboration of Astronomy Teaching Scholars (CATS) Program: Updates to Our New Community-Based Model for Astronomy Education Research. 215.1 indexed citations
14.
Prather, Edward E., et al.. (2006). The NASA Center for Astronomy Education (CAE): 2007 College Astronomy Teaching Excellence Workshops. American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts. 209.2 indexed citations
15.
Slater, Timothy F., et al.. (2006). Sorting Tasks and Vocabulary-in-Context Activities for Assessing Introductory Astronomy Understanding. AAS. 209.1 indexed citations
16.
Prather, Edward E., et al.. (2006). To Click or Not to Click is Not the Question: How Research with Clickers Develops a Better Understanding of When Learning Happens in Your Classroom. AAS. 209.2 indexed citations
17.
Prather, Edward E., et al.. (2006). Impact of the CAE Astronomy Teaching Excellence Workshop Program. American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts. 209.2 indexed citations
18.
Prather, Edward E., et al.. (2005). First Results from the Light and Spectroscopy Concept Inventory. AAS. 207.1 indexed citations
19.
Slater, Timothy F., et al.. (2004). Supporting Interactive Teaching Methods at the New Faculty Workshop with Astronomy Lecture-Tutorials. 204.
20.
Prather, Edward E., et al.. (2001). Student Understanding of Ionizing Radiation and Radioactivity.. The journal of college science teaching. 31(2). 89–93.15 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.