Colin S. Wallace

430 total citations
22 papers, 229 citations indexed

About

Colin S. Wallace is a scholar working on Education, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and Developmental and Educational Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Colin S. Wallace has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 229 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Education, 5 papers in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and 5 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology. Recurrent topics in Colin S. Wallace's work include Science Education and Pedagogy (11 papers), Innovative Teaching Methods (7 papers) and Experimental Learning in Engineering (4 papers). Colin S. Wallace is often cited by papers focused on Science Education and Pedagogy (11 papers), Innovative Teaching Methods (7 papers) and Experimental Learning in Engineering (4 papers). Colin S. Wallace collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and France. Colin S. Wallace's co-authors include Edward E. Prather, Janelle M. Bailey, D. K. Duncan, Stephanie V. Chasteen, M. Jordan Raddick, Chris Lintott, Arfon M. Smith, Alexander Rudolph, W. M. Schlingman and Brenda McIntosh and has published in prestigious journals such as The Astrophysical Journal, Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences and American Journal of Physics.

In The Last Decade

Colin S. Wallace

21 papers receiving 186 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Colin S. Wallace United States 9 160 58 27 22 16 22 229
Warren M. Christensen United States 9 265 1.7× 98 1.7× 40 1.5× 33 1.5× 3 0.2× 18 321
Michael Komorek Germany 7 321 2.0× 197 3.4× 20 0.7× 18 0.8× 2 0.1× 7 415
Cole Walsh United States 8 131 0.8× 49 0.8× 26 1.0× 56 2.5× 14 212
Gesche Pospiech Germany 6 188 1.2× 80 1.4× 22 0.8× 7 0.3× 3 0.2× 24 226
Jeffrey Nordine Germany 11 229 1.4× 125 2.2× 19 0.7× 24 1.1× 2 0.1× 25 307
Hendrik Jan Pol Netherlands 8 260 1.6× 170 2.9× 23 0.9× 33 1.5× 2 0.1× 14 363
Roger Trend United Kingdom 8 270 1.7× 81 1.4× 4 0.1× 7 0.3× 11 0.7× 14 364
Lili Cui United States 6 231 1.4× 112 1.9× 8 0.3× 27 1.2× 8 282
Arden Zylbersztajn Brazil 8 253 1.6× 100 1.7× 33 1.2× 8 0.4× 8 0.5× 21 301
Bradley S. Ambrose United States 5 241 1.5× 90 1.6× 64 2.4× 62 2.8× 2 0.1× 9 297

Countries citing papers authored by Colin S. Wallace

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Colin S. Wallace's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Colin S. Wallace with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Colin S. Wallace more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Colin S. Wallace

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Colin S. Wallace. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Colin S. Wallace. The network helps show where Colin S. Wallace may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Colin S. Wallace

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Colin S. Wallace. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Colin S. Wallace based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Colin S. Wallace. Colin S. Wallace is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Wallace, Colin S., et al.. (2021). Students Taught by a First-Time Instructor Using Active-Learning Teaching Strategies Outperform Students Taught by a Highly-Regarded Traditional Instructor. Journal of College Science Teaching. 50(4). 48–57. 3 indexed citations
2.
Beacham, Terry D., Brenda McIntosh, Ben Sutherland, et al.. (2020). Large-scale parentage-based tagging and genetic stock identification applied in assessing mixed-stock fisheries and hatchery brood stocks for coho salmon in British Columbia, Canada. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. 77(9). 1505–1517. 10 indexed citations
3.
Raddick, M. Jordan, Edward E. Prather, & Colin S. Wallace. (2019). Galaxy zoo: Science content knowledge of citizen scientists. Public Understanding of Science. 28(6). 636–651. 8 indexed citations
4.
Smith, David P., et al.. (2018). Transforming the content, pedagogy and structure of an introductory physics course for life sciences majors. American Journal of Physics. 86(11). 862–869. 1 indexed citations
6.
Prather, Edward E., et al.. (2016). Correlations Between Students' Written Responses to Lecture-Tutorial Questions and Their Understandings of Key Astrophysics Concepts. Journal of College Science Teaching. 45(3). 65–73. 2 indexed citations
7.
Burd, Gail D., Debra Tomanek, Paul Blowers, et al.. (2015). Developing faculty cultures for evidence-based teaching practices in STEM: A progress report. 90–102. 2 indexed citations
8.
Wallace, Colin S., et al.. (2015). A New Lecture-Tutorial for Teaching about Molecular Excitations and Synchrotron Radiation. The Physics Teacher. 54(1). 40–44. 2 indexed citations
9.
Wallace, Colin S., et al.. (2013). Astro 101 Students' Perceptions of Science: Results from the Thinking About Science Survey Instrument. Astronomy Education Review. 12(1). 7 indexed citations
10.
Prather, Edward E., et al.. (2013). Measuring the Conceptual Understandings of Citizen Scientists Participating in Zooniverse Projects: A First Approach. Astronomy Education Review. 12(1). 20 indexed citations
11.
Schlingman, W. M., et al.. (2012). A Classical Test Theory Analysis of the Light and Spectroscopy Concept Inventory National Study Data Set. Astronomy Education Review. 11(1). 10 indexed citations
13.
Wallace, Colin S., Edward E. Prather, & D. K. Duncan. (2012). A Study of General Education Astronomy Students’ Understandings of Cosmology. Part V. The Effects of a New Suite of CosmologyLecture-Tutorialson Students’ Conceptual Knowledge. International Journal of Science Education. 34(9). 1297–1314. 20 indexed citations
14.
Wallace, Colin S., Edward E. Prather, & D. K. Duncan. (2012). A Study of General Education Astronomy Students’ Understandings of Cosmology. Part IV. Common Difficulties Students Experience with Cosmology. Astronomy Education Review. 11(1). 20 indexed citations
15.
Wallace, Colin S. & Edward E. Prather. (2012). Teaching physics with Hubble’s law and dark matter. American Journal of Physics. 80(5). 382–390. 1 indexed citations
16.
Wallace, Colin S., Edward E. Prather, & D. K. Duncan. (2011). A Study of General Education Astronomy Students’ Understandings of Cosmology. Part I. Development and Validation of Four Conceptual Cosmology Surveys. Astronomy Education Review. 10(1). 10106–10106. 13 indexed citations
17.
Wallace, Colin S., Edward E. Prather, & D. K. Duncan. (2011). A Study of General Education Astronomy Students’ Understandings of Cosmology. Part II. Evaluating Four Conceptual Cosmology Surveys: A Classical Test Theory Approach. Astronomy Education Review. 10(1). 10107–10107. 8 indexed citations
18.
Wallace, Colin S. & Janelle M. Bailey. (2010). Do Concept Inventories Actually Measure Anything?. Astronomy Education Review. 9(1). 50 indexed citations
19.
Wallace, Colin S. & Stephanie V. Chasteen. (2010). Upper-division students’ difficulties with Ampère’s law. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research. 6(2). 30 indexed citations
20.
Wallace, Colin S.. (1984). The lost Australia of François Péron. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026