Donald L. Compton

10.7k total citations · 2 hit papers
127 papers, 7.5k citations indexed

About

Donald L. Compton is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Statistics and Probability and Education. According to data from OpenAlex, Donald L. Compton has authored 127 papers receiving a total of 7.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 116 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 61 papers in Statistics and Probability and 46 papers in Education. Recurrent topics in Donald L. Compton's work include Reading and Literacy Development (110 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (61 papers) and Language Development and Disorders (31 papers). Donald L. Compton is often cited by papers focused on Reading and Literacy Development (110 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (61 papers) and Language Development and Disorders (31 papers). Donald L. Compton collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Donald L. Compton's co-authors include Lynn S. Fuchs, Douglas Fuchs, Carol L. Hamlett, Joan Bryant, Amy M. Elleman, Russell Gersten, Mark S. Innocenti, Michael D. Coyne, Charles R. Greenwood and Pamela M. Seethaler and has published in prestigious journals such as American Psychologist, Child Development and Journal of Educational Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Donald L. Compton

120 papers receiving 7.0k citations

Hit Papers

Quality Indicators for Group Experimental and Quasi-Exper... 2005 2026 2012 2019 2005 2019 200 400 600

Peers

Donald L. Compton
Yaacov Petscher United States
Stanley L. Deno United States
Asha K. Jitendra United States
Peter F. de Jong Netherlands
Carol L. Hamlett United States
Matthew K. Burns United States
David J. Chard United States
Donald L. Compton
Citations per year, relative to Donald L. Compton Donald L. Compton (= 1×) peers Rauno Parrila

Countries citing papers authored by Donald L. Compton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Donald L. Compton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Donald L. Compton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Donald L. Compton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Donald L. Compton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Donald L. Compton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Donald L. Compton. The network helps show where Donald L. Compton may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Donald L. Compton

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Donald L. Compton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Donald L. Compton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Donald L. Compton. Donald L. Compton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Edwards, Ashley A., et al.. (2025). Is the Role of Set for Variability in Word Reading Influenced by Conditions Leading to Partial Decoding?. Scientific Studies of Reading. 29(5). 455–469.
3.
Steacy, Laura M., et al.. (2024). Modeling item-level variance of polysyllabic word reading in developing readers: Exploring semantically related child, word, and child-by-word predictors. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 246. 105998–105998. 1 indexed citations
4.
Edwards, Ashley A., et al.. (2023). Modeling Item-Level Spelling Variance in Adults: Providing Further Insights into Lexical Quality. Scientific Studies of Reading. 28(2). 120–141. 2 indexed citations
5.
Edwards, Ashley A., et al.. (2023). Does Spanish knowledge contribute to accurate English word spelling in adult bilinguals?. Bilingualism Language and Cognition. 26(5). 924–941. 1 indexed citations
6.
Edwards, Ashley A., et al.. (2023). Examining the Relationship Between Word Reading and Nonword Reading Development Within an Orthographic Learning Framework. The Elementary School Journal. 123(3). 396–413.
7.
Cho, Eunsoo, et al.. (2022). Relations Among Motivation, Executive Functions, and Reading Comprehension: Do They Differ for Students With and Without Reading Difficulties?. Scientific Studies of Reading. 27(4). 289–310. 3 indexed citations
8.
Steacy, Laura M., et al.. (2020). The Effect of Facilitative Versus Inhibitory Word Training Corpora on Word Reading Accuracy Growth in Children With Dyslexia. Learning Disability Quarterly. 44(3). 158–169. 2 indexed citations
9.
Edwards, Ashley, Laura M. Steacy, Noam Siegelman, et al.. (2020). Unpacking the Unique Relationship Between Set for Variability and Word Reading Development: Examining Word- and Child-Level Predictors of Performance. PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints). 1 indexed citations
10.
Petscher, Yaacov, et al.. (2020). Past perspectives and new opportunities for the explanatory item response model. Annals of Dyslexia. 70(2). 160–179. 16 indexed citations
11.
Grigorenko, Elena L., Donald L. Compton, Lynn S. Fuchs, et al.. (2019). Understanding, educating, and supporting children with specific learning disabilities: 50 years of science and practice.. American Psychologist. 75(1). 37–51. 186 indexed citations breakdown →
12.
Steacy, Laura M. & Donald L. Compton. (2018). Examining the role of imageability and regularity in word reading accuracy and learning efficiency among first and second graders at risk for reading disabilities. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 178. 226–250. 14 indexed citations
13.
Miller, Amanda C., Douglas Fuchs, Lynn S. Fuchs, et al.. (2014). Behavioral Attention: A Longitudinal Study of Whether and How It Influences the Development of Word Reading and Reading Comprehension Among At-Risk Readers. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness. 7(3). 232–249. 37 indexed citations
14.
Compton, Donald L., Douglas Fuchs, Lynn S. Fuchs, et al.. (2010). Selecting at-risk first-grade readers for early intervention: Eliminating false positives and exploring the promise of a two-stage gated screening process.. Journal of Educational Psychology. 102(2). 327–340. 145 indexed citations
15.
Varol, Hüseyin Atakan, Subramani Mani, Donald L. Compton, & Lynn S. Fuchs. (2009). Early prediction of reading disability using machine learning.. PubMed Central. 6 indexed citations
16.
Lemons, Christopher J., Alexandra P. Key, Douglas Fuchs, et al.. (2009). Predicting reading growth with event-related potentials: Thinking differently about indexing “Responsiveness”. Learning and Individual Differences. 20(3). 158–166. 8 indexed citations
17.
Compton, Donald L., et al.. (2005). Putting Transfer Back on Trial: Modeling Individual Differences in the Transfer of Decoding-Skill Gains to Other Aspects of Reading Acquisition.. Journal of Educational Psychology. 97(1). 55–69. 19 indexed citations
18.
Fuchs, Douglas, Lynn S. Fuchs, & Donald L. Compton. (2004). Identifying Reading Disabilities by Responsiveness-to-Instruction: Specifying Measures and Criteria. Learning Disability Quarterly. 27(4). 216–227. 164 indexed citations
19.
Baizerman, Michael & Donald L. Compton. (1993). Toward an Integrated, Whole Community Model of Dropout Prevention. 20(4). 17–20. 1 indexed citations
20.
Compton, Donald L. & Michael Baizerman. (1991). Services for At-Risk Students in Schools: Would More Be Better and Is Better Good Enough?.. Children today. 20(1). 8–11.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026