Amanda C. Miller

51 total papers · 1.4k total citations
26 papers, 660 citations indexed

About

Amanda C. Miller is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Religious studies. According to data from OpenAlex, Amanda C. Miller has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 660 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 8 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 5 papers in Religious studies. Recurrent topics in Amanda C. Miller's work include Reading and Literacy Development (11 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (5 papers) and Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (5 papers). Amanda C. Miller is often cited by papers focused on Reading and Literacy Development (11 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (5 papers) and Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (5 papers). Amanda C. Miller collaborates with scholars based in United States, Sweden and China. Amanda C. Miller's co-authors include Janice M. Keenan, Donald L. Compton, Peng Peng, Laura M. Steacy, Amy M. Elleman, Erik G. Willcutt, Bruce F. Pennington, Richard K. Olson, Rebecca S. Betjemann and Emily Shaw and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS Biology, Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology and Memory & Cognition.

In The Last Decade

Amanda C. Miller

25 papers receiving 630 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Amanda C. Miller 404 185 144 137 119 26 660
I. T. Draper 373 0.9× 310 1.7× 80 0.6× 143 1.0× 77 0.6× 26 783
Judith G. Foy 511 1.3× 220 1.2× 244 1.7× 80 0.6× 67 0.6× 25 787
Lucy C. Erickson 341 0.8× 270 1.5× 58 0.4× 53 0.4× 49 0.4× 19 744
Maria Grazia Tosto 229 0.6× 93 0.5× 220 1.5× 194 1.4× 64 0.5× 27 777
Stephanie N. Del Tufo 306 0.8× 339 1.8× 53 0.4× 84 0.6× 68 0.6× 27 607
Chantal Roggeman 143 0.4× 479 2.6× 124 0.9× 213 1.6× 54 0.5× 14 726
Sarah Griffiths 218 0.5× 462 2.5× 97 0.7× 58 0.4× 87 0.7× 35 789
Victoria C. P. Knowland 231 0.6× 393 2.1× 102 0.7× 51 0.4× 44 0.4× 25 617
Haiying Meng 485 1.2× 163 0.9× 84 0.6× 186 1.4× 41 0.3× 18 672
Roeland Hancock 490 1.2× 486 2.6× 67 0.5× 178 1.3× 73 0.6× 30 729

Countries citing papers authored by Amanda C. Miller

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda C. Miller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda C. Miller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda C. Miller more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda C. Miller

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda C. Miller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda C. Miller. The network helps show where Amanda C. Miller may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amanda C. Miller

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amanda C. Miller. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amanda C. Miller based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amanda C. Miller. Amanda C. Miller is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026