Diana Rus

844 total citations
29 papers, 555 citations indexed

About

Diana Rus is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Diana Rus has authored 29 papers receiving a total of 555 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Social Psychology, 11 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 10 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management. Recurrent topics in Diana Rus's work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (9 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (6 papers) and Ethics in Business and Education (4 papers). Diana Rus is often cited by papers focused on Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (9 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (6 papers) and Ethics in Business and Education (4 papers). Diana Rus collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and United States. Diana Rus's co-authors include Barbara Wisse, Daan van Knippenberg, Michaéla C. Schippers, Nico W. Van Yperen, Adam D. Galinsky, Naomi B. Rothman, Frank Pot, Joe C. Magee, Andrew R. Todd and P.R.A. Oeij and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Business Ethics, The Leadership Quarterly and Frontiers in Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Diana Rus

27 papers receiving 529 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Diana Rus Netherlands	11	263	238	185	80	73	29	555
Ryan Outlaw United States	9	344 1.3×	224 0.9×	252 1.4×	51 0.6×	56 0.8×	11	649
Patrick E. Downes United States	9	305 1.2×	206 0.9×	157 0.8×	34 0.4×	67 0.9×	16	619
Maria Tomprou United States	11	396 1.5×	153 0.6×	241 1.3×	40 0.5×	57 0.8×	22	715
Brian C. Holtz United States	12	474 1.8×	199 0.8×	295 1.6×	73 0.9×	74 1.0×	22	800
Meena Andiappan Canada	10	329 1.3×	118 0.5×	191 1.0×	150 1.9×	49 0.7×	25	554
Yuen Lam Bavik Macao	7	377 1.4×	133 0.6×	184 1.0×	115 1.4×	66 0.9×	8	776
Adam C. Stoverink United States	11	327 1.2×	221 0.9×	151 0.8×	41 0.5×	120 1.6×	19	672
David S. DeGeest United States	8	231 0.9×	193 0.8×	116 0.6×	37 0.5×	70 1.0×	13	519
Daniel W. Newton United States	10	483 1.8×	279 1.2×	238 1.3×	34 0.4×	58 0.8×	20	717

Countries citing papers authored by Diana Rus

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Diana Rus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diana Rus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diana Rus more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Diana Rus

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diana Rus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diana Rus. The network helps show where Diana Rus may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Diana Rus

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Diana Rus. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Diana Rus based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Diana Rus. Diana Rus is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Schippers, Michaéla C., et al.. (2025). Letters to the future challenge: A scalable online tool to engage management students with the SDGs. The International Journal of Management Education. 23(3). 101233–101233. 1 indexed citations

Rus, Diana, et al.. (2023). Exploration career role enactment and employability evaluations: the moderating roles of leader opening and closing behaviours. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology. 33(1). 67–81. 4 indexed citations

Schippers, Michaéla C., et al.. (2023). Shaping ideal futures: Writing a letter to the future. SSRN Electronic Journal.

Schippers, Michaéla C. & Diana Rus. (2021). Optimizing Decision-Making Processes in Times of COVID-19. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 45 indexed citations

Schippers, Michaéla C. & Diana Rus. (2020). Optimizing Decision-Making Processes in Times of COVID-19: Using Reflexivity to Counteract Information-Processing Failures. Frontiers in Psychology. 12. 650525–650525. 2 indexed citations

Rus, Diana, et al.. (2019). Workplace innovation: a review and potential future avenues. International Journal of Technology Transfer and Commercialisation. 16(3). 208–208. 7 indexed citations

Oeij, P.R.A., S. Dhondt, Diana Rus, & Geert Van Hootegem. (2019). The digital transformation requires workplace innovation: an introduction. TNO Repository. 16(3). 199–208. 10 indexed citations

Oeij, P.R.A., Diana Rus, & Frank Pot. (2017). Workplace Innovation. University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark). 22 indexed citations

Wisse, Barbara, et al.. (2016). On Ethically Solvent Leaders: The Roles of Pride and Moral Identity in Predicting Leader Ethical Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics. 150(3). 631–645. 36 indexed citations

10.

Rus, Diana, et al.. (2016). Open Innovation. Oxford University Press eBooks. 5 indexed citations

11.

Wisse, Barbara, et al.. (2014). C'est le Ton Qui Fait la Critique—for the powerful: the effects of feedback framing and power on affective reactions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 44(12). 795–805. 3 indexed citations

12.

Wisse, Barbara, et al.. (2014). When uncertainty counteracts feedback seeking: The effects of interpersonal uncertainty and power on direct feedback seeking. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology. 24(2). 211–224. 10 indexed citations

13.

Galinsky, Adam D., Joe C. Magee, Diana Rus, Naomi B. Rothman, & Andrew R. Todd. (2014). Acceleration With Steering. Social Psychological and Personality Science. 5(6). 627–635. 48 indexed citations

14.

Wisse, Barbara, et al.. (2013). Ethically Bankrupted Leaders: Feelings of Contempt Disrupt Leaders’ Identity Based Moral Compass. Academy of Management Proceedings. 2013(1). 14427–14427. 1 indexed citations

15.

Wisse, Barbara & Diana Rus. (2012). Leader Self-Concept and Self-Interested Behavior. Journal of Personnel Psychology. 11(1). 40–48. 35 indexed citations

16.

Rus, Diana, Daan van Knippenberg, & Barbara Wisse. (2011). Leader power and self-serving behavior: The Moderating Role of Accountability. The Leadership Quarterly. 23(1). 13–26. 87 indexed citations

17.

Galinsky, Adam D., Diana Rus, & Joris Lammers. (2010). Power: A central force governing psychological, social, and organizational life.. 17–38. 8 indexed citations

18.

Rus, Diana, Daan van Knippenberg, & Barbara Wisse. (2010). Leader self-definition and leader self-serving behavior. The Leadership Quarterly. 21(3). 509–529. 70 indexed citations

19.

Rus, Diana, Daan van Knippenberg, & Barbara Wisse. (2010). Leader power and leader self-serving behavior: The role of effective leadership beliefs and performance information. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 46(6). 922–933. 67 indexed citations

20.

Rus, Diana. (2009). The Dark Side of Leadership: Exploring the Psychology of Leader Self-serving Behavior. RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam). 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact