Diana Rus
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 5%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Information Systems and Management top 5%
- Clinical Psychology
- Co-authors
- Barbara WisseDaan van KnippenbergMichaéla C. SchippersNico W. Van YperenAdam D. GalinskyNaomi B. RothmanFrank PotJoe C. Magee
- Topics
- Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (9 papers)Social and Intergroup Psychology (6 papers)Ethics in Business and Education (4 papers)
- Cited by
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource ManagementSocial PsychologyInformation Systems and Management
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Diana Rus
27 papers receiving 529 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 263
- Social Psychology 238
- Sociology and Political Science 185
- Information Systems and Management 80
- Clinical Psychology 73
Countries citing papers authored by Diana Rus
This map shows the geographic impact of Diana Rus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diana Rus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diana Rus more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Diana Rus
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diana Rus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diana Rus. The network helps show where Diana Rus may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Diana Rus
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Diana Rus. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Diana Rus based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Diana Rus. Diana Rus is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 45 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | The digital transformation requires workplace innovation: an introduction | 10 |
| 8 | 22 | |
| 9 | 36 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 10 | |
| 13 | 48 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 35 | |
| 16 | 87 | |
| 17 | 8 | |
| 18 | 70 | |
| 19 | 67 | |
| 20 | The Dark Side of Leadership: Exploring the Psychology of Leader Self-serving Behavior | 3 |
About Diana Rus
Diana Rus is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Applied Psychology and Information Systems and Management, having authored 29 papers that have together received 555 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (9 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (6 papers) and Ethics in Business and Education (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (263 citations), Social Psychology (238 citations) and Information Systems and Management (80 citations). Diana Rus has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Barbara Wisse, Daan van Knippenberg, Michaéla C. Schippers, Nico W. Van Yperen, Adam D. Galinsky, Naomi B. Rothman, Frank Pot, Joe C. Magee, Andrew R. Todd and P.R.A. Oeij. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Business Ethics, The Leadership Quarterly and Frontiers in Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.