Joris Lammers

4.5k total citations
74 papers, 2.8k citations indexed

About

Joris Lammers is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Joris Lammers has authored 74 papers receiving a total of 2.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 54 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 35 papers in Social Psychology and 15 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Joris Lammers's work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (42 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (15 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (14 papers). Joris Lammers is often cited by papers focused on Social and Intergroup Psychology (42 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (15 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (14 papers). Joris Lammers collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Netherlands and United States. Joris Lammers's co-authors include Adam D. Galinsky, Diederik A. Stapel, Janka I. Stoker, Ernestine Gordijn, Sabine Otten, Yoel Inbar, Matthew Baldwin, David Dubois, Derek D. Rucker and Anne Gast and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology and Psychological Science.

In The Last Decade

Joris Lammers

70 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Joris Lammers 1.7k 1.3k 560 375 360 74 2.8k
Thomas Kessler 2.5k 1.4× 1.7k 1.3× 500 0.9× 358 1.0× 163 0.5× 72 3.4k
J.W. Ouwerkerk 2.4k 1.4× 2.0k 1.6× 497 0.9× 354 0.9× 388 1.1× 35 3.8k
Cynthia S. Wang 1.3k 0.8× 884 0.7× 372 0.7× 165 0.4× 303 0.8× 39 2.3k
Daan Scheepers 1.5k 0.9× 1.2k 0.9× 483 0.9× 295 0.8× 279 0.8× 76 2.3k
Steven Fein 1.8k 1.0× 1.3k 1.0× 549 1.0× 305 0.8× 271 0.8× 32 2.9k
Danielle Gaucher 1.5k 0.9× 1.1k 0.9× 428 0.8× 375 1.0× 130 0.4× 25 2.5k
Sabine Otten 2.7k 1.6× 1.9k 1.5× 604 1.1× 832 2.2× 569 1.6× 107 4.1k
Jennifer Whitson 1.5k 0.9× 1.1k 0.9× 647 1.2× 141 0.4× 258 0.7× 30 2.6k
Kristin Laurin 1.6k 0.9× 1.4k 1.1× 537 1.0× 166 0.4× 132 0.4× 58 2.8k
Curtis D. Hardin 2.4k 1.4× 1.7k 1.3× 539 1.0× 534 1.4× 115 0.3× 39 3.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Joris Lammers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joris Lammers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joris Lammers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joris Lammers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joris Lammers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joris Lammers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joris Lammers. The network helps show where Joris Lammers may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joris Lammers

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joris Lammers. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joris Lammers based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joris Lammers. Joris Lammers is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Kube, Sebastian, et al.. (2025). Maintaining cooperation through vertical communication of trust when removing sanctions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 122(12). e2415010122–e2415010122.
2.
Alves, Hans, et al.. (2025). Understanding the Devaluation of Female Leaders: A Cognitive-Ecological Perspective. Social Psychological and Personality Science. 17(1). 7–16.
3.
Lammers, Joris, et al.. (2025). When longing goes wrong: Nostalgia can cause a preference for harmful aspects of the past. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy. 25(1). 1 indexed citations
4.
Baldwin, Matthew, et al.. (2024). Temporal comparisons shape system justification processes. Political Psychology. 46(3). 654–672.
5.
Lammers, Joris, et al.. (2024). The Cognitive-Motivational Roots of Conservatives' Desire for the Past. Social Cognition. 42(3). 233–259.
6.
Baldwin, Matthew, et al.. (2024). Highlighting the Old in the “New Normal”. Social Psychology. 55(2). 88–100. 1 indexed citations
7.
Lammers, Joris & Jan Crusius. (2024). Teaching simple heuristics can reduce the exponential growth bias in judging historic CO2 emission growth. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy. 24(2). 567–584. 1 indexed citations
8.
Liu, Zhengtai, et al.. (2023). Psychological power increases the desire for social distance but reduces the sense of social distance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 110. 104528–104528. 7 indexed citations
9.
Lammers, Joris, et al.. (2023). Political-Ideological Differences in Cultural Pessimism and Nostalgia Reflect People’s Evaluation of Their Nation’s Historical Developments. Social Psychological and Personality Science. 15(3). 370–380. 7 indexed citations
10.
Lammers, Joris. (2023). Collective nostalgia and political ideology. Current Opinion in Psychology. 52. 101607–101607. 12 indexed citations
11.
Lammers, Joris, et al.. (2022). Disentangling the factors behind shifting voting intentions: The bandwagon effect reflects heuristic processing, while the underdog effect reflects fairness concerns. Journal of Social and Political Psychology. 10(2). 676–692. 5 indexed citations
12.
13.
Lammers, Joris, et al.. (2021). Why People Hate Congress but Love Their Own Congressperson: An Information Processing Explanation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 48(3). 412–425. 6 indexed citations
14.
Fleischmann, Alexandra, Joris Lammers, Kathi Diel, Wilhelm Hofmann, & Adam D. Galinsky. (2021). More threatening and more diagnostic: How moral comparisons differ from social comparisons.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 121(5). 1057–1078. 20 indexed citations
15.
Lammers, Joris, Jan Crusius, & Anne Gast. (2020). Correcting misperceptions of exponential coronavirus growth increases support for social distancing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 117(28). 16264–16266. 87 indexed citations
16.
Fleischmann, Alexandra, Joris Lammers, Paul Conway, & Adam D. Galinsky. (2020). Kant be Compared: People High in Social Comparison Orientation Make Fewer—Not More—Deontological Decisions in Sacrificial Dilemmas. Social Psychological and Personality Science. 12(6). 984–995. 3 indexed citations
17.
Lammers, Joris & Matthew Baldwin. (2020). Make America gracious again: Collective nostalgia can increase and decrease support for right‐wing populist rhetoric. European Journal of Social Psychology. 50(5). 943–954. 45 indexed citations
18.
Lammers, Joris & Pascal Burgmer. (2018). Power increases the self‐serving bias in the attribution of collective successes and failures. European Journal of Social Psychology. 49(5). 1087–1095. 10 indexed citations
19.
Lammers, Joris & Diederik A. Stapel. (2009). How power influences moral thinking.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 97(2). 279–289. 94 indexed citations
20.
Lammers, Joris, et al.. (2007). Jaarboek Sociale Psychologie 2006. 17(10). 1876–90. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026