Daniela Noethen

493 total citations
8 papers, 344 citations indexed

About

Daniela Noethen is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Communication and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniela Noethen has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 344 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 3 papers in Communication and 2 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Daniela Noethen's work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (3 papers), International Student and Expatriate Challenges (3 papers) and Cultural Differences and Values (2 papers). Daniela Noethen is often cited by papers focused on Social and Intergroup Psychology (3 papers), International Student and Expatriate Challenges (3 papers) and Cultural Differences and Values (2 papers). Daniela Noethen collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Spain and United States. Daniela Noethen's co-authors include Ingo Zettler, Jutta Solga, Gerhard Blickle, Gerald R. Ferris, Jochen Kramer, James A. Meurs, Paula B. Schneider, Jaime Bonache, Elena Lvina and Gary Johns and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Vocational Behavior, The International Journal of Human Resource Management and Journal of Managerial Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Daniela Noethen

8 papers receiving 322 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Daniela Noethen Germany	6	193	131	111	82	55	8	344
Jutta Solga Germany	3	174 0.9×	119 0.9×	104 0.9×	82 1.0×	51 0.9×	3	305
Annilee Game United Kingdom	7	167 0.9×	118 0.9×	86 0.8×	46 0.6×	42 0.8×	15	343
Galit Meisler Israel	7	297 1.5×	138 1.1×	213 1.9×	53 0.6×	29 0.5×	11	426
Xiongying Niu China	8	232 1.2×	92 0.7×	127 1.1×	57 0.7×	23 0.4×	15	414
Dana McDaniel Sumpter United States	8	233 1.2×	123 0.9×	129 1.2×	41 0.5×	36 0.7×	15	386
Michelle C. Bligh United States	9	188 1.0×	86 0.7×	101 0.9×	37 0.5×	29 0.5×	15	346
Liam P. Maher United States	10	293 1.5×	154 1.2×	104 0.9×	43 0.5×	50 0.9×	18	421
Xiji Zhu China	11	151 0.8×	76 0.6×	75 0.7×	42 0.5×	27 0.5×	20	327
Norma Heaton United Kingdom	9	180 0.9×	55 0.4×	237 2.1×	62 0.8×	46 0.8×	19	442

Countries citing papers authored by Daniela Noethen

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniela Noethen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniela Noethen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniela Noethen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniela Noethen

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniela Noethen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniela Noethen. The network helps show where Daniela Noethen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniela Noethen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniela Noethen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniela Noethen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniela Noethen. Daniela Noethen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Noethen, Daniela, et al.. (2020). Experimental research in expatriation and its challenges: A literature review and recommendations. German Journal of Human Resource Management Zeitschrift für Personalforschung. 34(2). 252–283. 5 indexed citations

2.

Noethen, Daniela, et al.. (2019). Challenges of Conducting Experimental Research in IHRM: Review and Recommendations for Expatriation. Academy of Management Proceedings. 2019(1). 12357–12357. 2 indexed citations

3.

Bonache, Jaime & Daniela Noethen. (2014). The impact of individual performance on organizational success and its implications for the management of expatriates. The International Journal of Human Resource Management. 25(14). 1960–1977. 22 indexed citations

4.

Lvina, Elena, Gary Johns, Darren C. Treadway, et al.. (2012). Measure invariance of the Political Skill Inventory (PSI) across five cultures. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management. 12(2). 171–191. 54 indexed citations

5.

Noethen, Daniela. (2011). Knowledge Transfer in Teams and Its Role for the Prevention of Knowledge Loss. 3 indexed citations

6.

Ferris, Gerald R., Gerhard Blickle, Paula B. Schneider, et al.. (2008). Political skill construct and criterion‐related validation: a two‐study investigation. Journal of Managerial Psychology. 23(7). 744–771. 129 indexed citations

7.

Blickle, Gerhard, James A. Meurs, Ingo Zettler, et al.. (2007). Personality, political skill, and job performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 72(3). 377–387. 122 indexed citations

8.

Bröder, Arndt, et al.. (2006). Utilization of covariation knowledge in source monitoring: no evidence for implicit processes. Psychological Research. 71(5). 524–538. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact